| 
      Section D:   
      Harmonization and Streamlining | 
    
      | Results | Actions Needed | 
      ResponsibleRGC Institutions
 | LeadDonor
 | 
      Milestones | 
      Timing | 
    
      | 1.  
      Donor-Donor harmonization is strengthened to reduce transaction costs and 
      to maximize ODA benefits for Cambodia | 
    
      | a) Decrease burden on the 
      Government in the formulation of Donors' strategies and plans.
 | (i) Donors prepare joint country assistance strategies.
 
 ii) Donors deliver their assistance through SWAps, SWiMs and PBAs.
 | CDC, MEF and concerned Ministries
 
 Sector ministries
 | TWGs
 
 
 
 TWGs
 | Fewer stand alone donor country strategies.
 
 
 At least two more SWAPs prepared.
 
 SWAPs in other areas formulated.
 | on-going
 
 
 
 June 2005
 
 December 2006
 | 
    
      | b) Donor field offices have sufficient authority to enable the 
      implementation of country-based harmonization initiatives.
 | (i) Donors HQ's take action to decentralize authority to their Cambodia 
      country offices to provide maximum flexibility in implementing the 
      harmonization action plan.
 
 (ii) Donor country Offices take actions to tackle HQ constraints where 
      these occur.
 | CDC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CDC
 | Donor HQs, and country offices
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Donor country offices
 | HQ's delegate the authority to country offices needed to implement 
      Cambodia's Action Plan on Harmonization and Alignment.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information on donor country office constraints to harmonize shared at 
      GDCC meetings.
 | January-December 2005.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 on-going
 | 
    
      | c) Donors further harmonize their practices at the implementation stages 
      of sector programs.
 | 
      (I)  Existing and new TWGs work on sector harmonization action plan 
      appropriate to their circumstances, including addressing salary 
      supplementation issues.
 | CDC, CAR, and MEF
 | TWG/PAR/PFM
       | Harmonization Action Plan for the sector prepared and agreed between RGC 
      and donors, including salary supplementation issue.
 | December 2005
 | 
    
      | 
      (i)  
      Donors integrate PIUs/PMUs into 
      RGC's institutional structures.
 | Concerned ministries
 | TWGs
 | PIUs/PMUs integrated into Government structures by 2007
 | 2005
 | 
    
      | d) Donors commit to eliminating duplication of activities.
 | 
      (i)   
      All new activities to be peer 
      reviewed by TWGs to avoid duplication/gaps, and maximize synergies.
 | CDC and concerned ministries
 | TWGs
 | TWG report on steps taken to reduce duplication.
   | 2005
 | 
    
    
    
      | 
      f) Donors 
      undertake fewer missions, and increase the proportion of  joint missions 
      especially for analytical work, sector review, evaluation and monitoring.
 | 
      (i) TWGs prepare 
      a calendar of planned donor missions in their area.
 | 
      CDC and line 
      ministries
 | 
      TWGs
 
        | 
      Reduced number 
      of donor missions.
 | 
      2005
 | 
    
      | 
      g) Donors 
      decrease the burden on government of project management
 | 
      (i) TWGs use 
      SMART indicators to reduce the burden of project management.
 | 
      CDC and line 
      ministries
 | 
      TWGs
 
        | 
      Indicators 
      prepared.
 | 
      2005
 | 
    
      | 
      (ii) Increased 
      number of delegated cooperation/lead agency arrangements.
 | 
      CDC and line 
      ministries
 | 
      TWGs
 
        | 
      Non resident 
      donors deliver their assistance through delegated cooperation arrangements
 | 
      2005
 | 
    
      | 
      (iii) Increased 
      donor commitment to multi-year resourcing, linked to government multi-year 
      budgeting system.
 | 
      MEF
 | 
      TWGs
 
        |  | 
      2005
 | 
    
      | 
      (iv) Increased 
      number of joint donor missions.
 | 
      CDC
 | 
      TWGS
 | 
      Increase 
      proportion of joint missions by 10% pa, decrease individual missions by 10 
      p.a.
 | 
      2005
 |