Annex One
Partnership and Harmonisation Technical Working Group
2011 Annual Work Plan (Draft 2 February 2011)
Aid effectiveness objective |
P&H TWG Activity (1) |
Responsible parties |
Output indicator |
Timing |
To provide a forum for establishing consensus on aid effectiveness priorities, consistent with policy framework - P&H TWG ToR para IV(a) |
||||
Produce Aid Effectiveness Report with policy recommendations(CDCF Q4 2011) |
Discuss AER Concept Note and provide inputs to draft AER AER to provide inputs to a new policy framework |
All TWG members All DPs |
CN produced and agreed by TWG AER finalised for CDCF dialogue |
Q3 2011 (CN) Q4 2011 (Draft AER) |
Promote use of country systems |
Concept Note produced to review progress and strategy Support national workshop (May 2011) Prepare roadmap for next steps |
CRDB sub-group of P+H TWG sub-group of P+H TWG |
Feb 2011 discussion Workshop held Roadmap produced |
Feb 2011 May 2011 second half 2011 |
Promote programme-based approaches |
TWG to offer inputs and comments for development of PBA training resources and to provide updates on sector progress |
All TWG members |
PBA resources developed PBA clinics provided by CRDB to TWGs |
Q2 2011 On demand |
To provide recommendations on the formulation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of aid effectiveness initiatives - P&H TWG ToR para IV(b) |
||||
Strengthening dialogue and coordination arrangements |
Provide inputs to a discussion paper on the GDCC and links to CDCF and TWGs |
CRDB All TWG members |
Paper produced Inputs incorporated for GDCC |
Q1 2011 Q2 2011 |
Link aid effectiveness work to results-based monitoring at sector level |
Reformulate JMI matrix for all TWGs (with clear results chains & linking aid effectiveness activity to core work) |
GDCC |
JMI matrix revised |
Q3 2011 |
Assess link between aid effectiveness policy, behaviour change and development results |
Finalise Evaluation and conduct Monitoring Survey of PD to identify relevant lessons for Cambodia |
All P+H TWG |
PD Evaluation study and survey results produced |
Q2 2011 |
Provide inputs to HLF-4 in Busan |
Dialogue with all partners (RGC, DPs and CSOs to agree key messages for Busan meeting) |
All P+H TWG TWG Network |
AER to include key messages for HLF-4 |
Q4 2011 |
To promote information exchange and peer learning - P&H TWG ToR para IV(c) |
||||
Promote the implementation of national aid management priorities and the relevant application of global aid principles |
To provide a forum to discuss progress and share sector level experience of implementation (especially sector level results and capacity-focused work), including with NGOs |
RGC P+H focal points All P+H TWG members
|
Ministries and P+H TWG NGO representatives share experience for wider discussion |
Each TWG meeting |
Strengthen integration between central planning, budgeting and aid management processes |
P+H TWG to act as discussion forum and opportunity for information sharing (together with PFM and PPR TWGs) on RGC initiatives and proposals related to integrating and strengthening core planning/budgeting processes. (2) |
MOP (lead) CRDB MEF
|
tbc (MoP) |
tbc |
To identify – and seek remedies to - emerging opportunities and challenges related to national or global aid effectiveness commitments - P&H TWG ToR para IV(d) |
||||
Promotion of South-South Cooperation (SSC) and management arrangements |
Members to provide details of experience and initiatives for further consideration by RGC |
CRDB (lead) RGC P+H members |
Policy direction on SSC included in 2011 AER |
Q4 2011 |
Ensure that new development partner personnel are well-briefed on national arrangements for managing development cooperation and partnerships |
The induction resource for development partners is posted on CRDB website. The TWG will work in an advisory capacity to update the structure and content for newly-arrived DPs |
All P+H members |
On-line induction briefing up-dated on-line |
On-going |
Notes 1. Some activities may be taken forward by smaller groups, as agreed by the full membership of P+H TWG. 2. MoP is the lead agency on this initiative so PPR TWG is the principal forum. 3. Not all tasks/responsibilities included in the P&H TWG ToR (para IV) are explicitly included in the 2011 AWP but may be addressed as the need arises. |