|
Report
TWG
Retreat Network
February 27-28
Sihanoukville
|
|
A-
Result Framework
A1:
YES. Relationship are as followings.
a) Sector policy/strategy,
b) Annual work plan only for secretariat but
not for the sector as a whole. To fully reflect the good work being done to
improve justice system the strategy and action plan of CLJR need to be updated
through the broad process of participating.
c) NSDP: Planned Actions to implement the
Prioritised of LJR sector has been put in the NSDP updated, but annual work plan
for the sector and Budgeting Strategic Plan has not been prepared.
Challenges:
there is not enough clearance of coordination mechanism between DPs and
implementing ministries. General Secretary of council for legal and judicial
reform is difficult to hold implementing ministries accountable for their
contribution to implementation of the legal and judicial reform strategy. Sector
is very broad, and there are only few donors to support this sector.
d) JMIs: have been submitted regularly to
CDC,
e) TWG work plan: yes |
|
A-
Result Framework (con’t)
A2 :
YES.
Anti-corruption law
Criminal code and Criminal Procedure
code
Civil code and Civil Procedure code
Above laws have already been adopted and
there are still 3 more fundamental laws have not been adopted. These laws
are law on statue of the judge and prosecutor, law on the organization and
functioning of the court, and amendment law on supreme council of
magistracy.
A3:
Still under development including incorporation of achievements under police
and prison reform and village and commune safety policy.
A4:
There is weak support from the donors because there is no clear result
framework yet.
A5:
cannot be determined unless there is an update of action plan for LJR
sector.
A6:
we need to review JMI for updated.
A7
: NO. |
|
B-Use of PBA B1: CLJR want to use PBA,
but there is not enough support from the Donors. B2: not applicable B3: not applicable B4: yes, CLJR are willing
to work with CRDB/CDC to develop a pilot country systems assessment tool in
the area of budget integration and capacity development areas. B5: PBA establishment. |
|
C-Partnership & Dialogue Mechanism
C1: a-) Done well, and could be improve B-) Done well, and could be improve C-) Not yet d-) Yes, but we need to have closed dialogue on how to
update the Action Plan. C2: No, there are some
behind constrains. C3:: inter-ministerial
collaboration with high level political leadership. C4:
Assessment such as PBA, Partnering skill Assessment on how to overcome the lack of in
inter-ministerial collaboration with high level political leadership. |