Introductory Remarks
of
H. E. Ou Orhat
Secretary of State, Ministry of Planning
Chairman of TWG-PPR
at GDCC Meeting, 14 June 2006
Agenda Item: NDSP Monitoring Framework
Excellency Chairman,
Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I
would like to provide a brief update on NSDP and the TWG on PPR. Since
the last GDCC meeting the developments have been:
-
The National Assembly
considered and approved NSDP on 9 May and the Senate approved the same
on 9 June. It will now go for final approval by His Majesty the King.
-
In March, a high level
Steering Committee to advise on and oversee NSDP implementation was
constituted. It consists of MOP, SNEC/MEF, CRDB and four line
ministries, viz., Agriculture, Education, Health and Rural
Development.
-
In April the Senior
Minister, MOP, wrote to all Ministries and Agencies asking them to
take pro-active steps to implement NSDP, in particular to start
formulating sector plans where they don’t already exist.
-
As agreed at the meeting
of the TWG on PPR in December 2005, a small core group was constituted
under consisting of both development partners and key RGC ministries
under my chairmanship. It is chaired by me and has met twice so far —
once on 24 April and the latest on 8 June.
-
I am glad to report that
the very first JMI agreed upon at the last CG meeting has been
achieved. On 1 June the high level Steering Committee considered and
endorsed the draft NSDP Monitoring Framework prepared by MOP in
consultation with SNEC, MEF and CRDB. This draft was further
considered at the meeting of the core group of PPR TWG on 8 June.
Taking into account some suggestions made by the core group, the NSDP
Monitoring Framework has been edited. Copies are circulated at this
meeting.
-
The framework will be the
basis for our further action. We will produce an annual progress
report on NSDP in the first quarter of 2007 in consultation with all
ministries and agencies and the PPR TWG.
We
will be taking further action in the coming months to further pursue
dissemination of NSDP at provincial and other levels, prepare the next
PIP, 2007-09 in conformity with the NSDP, and dialogue with and assist
all line ministries and agencies in monitoring the progress of key
indicators.
In
this regard, we would like to suggest that each ministry and agency
should at a minimum have a clear plan for the medium-term consistent
with the NSDP. This could form the basis for each TWG to identify
priority needs still to be funded and for development partners to
readjust and realign their assistance according to those needs.
Thank you for your attention.
Version 9 June 2006
NSDP MONITORING FRAMEWORK
I. BACKGROUND
1.
The National Strategic Development Plan (NSDP) for 2006-2010 is the
single, overarching document that outlines RGC’s priority goals and
strategies to reduce poverty rapidly and to achieve other CMBGs and
socioeconomic development goals for the benefit of all Cambodians, It
operationalized the Rectangular Strategy to achieve its intended goals.
Also, a Public Investment Program (PIP) for 2006-2008 to support the
implementation of the NSDP has been prepared. Both of these documents were
approved by the Royal Government at a Cabinet meeting on 27 January 2006.
These documents will also guide the external development partners in
aligning and harmonizing their efforts to improve aid-effectiveness and to
secure a higher “net transfer of resources” focused on reducing poverty
among the poor in Cambodia and achieving targeted development results
better and more efficiently than has been the case in the past.
2.
The Royal Government will be monitoring the implementation of the NSDP by:
-
Preparing an annual
progress report on the implementation of the NSDP,
-
Carrying out a
comprehensive review, towards the end of 2009, of progress made En
achieving the targeted development results of NSDP e.g. reduction in the
overall poverty rate from the current levels (2005 assessment) at the
national and sub-national levels and other CMDGs; and identifying
opportunities and constraints to guide and serve as important inputs in
formulating the NSDP 2011-2015.
3,
This note outlines the objectives, coverage and methodology for the
preparation of the annual progress reports on the implementation of the
NSDP. i.e. item (i) in paragraph 2 above.
II. OBJECTIVES
4.
The main objectives of the annual monitoring of progress in the
implementation of the NSDP are to present a succinct analysis on:
-
Degree of alignment of
development resources, both from National Budget and ODA, with the
sectoral allocation of development resources and priorities outlined in
the NSDP, including an analysis on the national and ODA resources that
were allocated for programs and projects constituting the PIP 2006-2008,
and national and ODA resources that were provided to support programs
and projects outside the PIP 2006-2008.
-
Progress in achieving the
socio-economic development targets of NSDP at the national and
sub-national levels, including the CMDGs. and recommendations to achieve
the targeted development results.
III. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE ANNUAL
MONITORENG PROGRESS REPORT
5.
The annual monitoring progress report will provide analysis on the
following issues:
-
The degree of alignment of
the allocation and disbursement of financial resources in the National
Budget with the sectoral priorities targeted in the NSDP.
-
The degree of alignment of
pledges and disbursements by the external development partners with
sectoral priorities targeted in the NSDP (Table 5.2 of NSDP).
-
Progress in implementing
key strategies and actions in various sectors outlined in NSDP, in
particular preparation of sector plans at the national and sub-national
levels, where they do not exist at present.
-
Assessment of progress made
in achieving selected core indicators of NSDP (Table 3.2 of NSDP).
-
Recommendations and
proposed adjustments to the NSDP.
IV. METHODOLOGY AND INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
6.
The choice of methodology is governed by the basic principle that the
annual monitoring of progress will be based on administrative statistics
from implementing institutions and available updated information from the
National Institute of Statistics (NIS) and/or other secondary sources with
a minimal, if any, stand alone primary data collection effort. A high
priority will be given to capacity development in terms of the Statistical
Master Plan and other mechanisms in areas where systems for collecting and
analyzing the required administrative statistics are not robust enough or
need to be put in place as an important element of the annual monitoring
process.
7. Of the 43 core indicators of NSDP, the 26 indicators for which
administrative statistics are or can be collected by relevant
ministries/agencies and the NIS are shown in Annex I. The Ministry of
Planning has already begun discussions with the concerned
ministries/agencies to prepare the information on these selected core
indicators along with a qualitative assessment of progress in their
sectors as the input in the preparation of the annual monitoring report.
In addition, the MEF has agreed to prepare and provide an assessment on
issue (i) listed in section III above, and the CDC/CRDB has agreed to
prepare and provide to MOP an assessment on issues (ii) listed in section
III above. A summary of the roles and responsibilities of ministries and
agencies in the preparation of the Annual Monitoring Report is presented
in Annex II.
8.
The Ministry of Planning (MOP) will lead the task of preparation of the
Annual Monitoring Report in close collaboration with the Ministry of
Economy and Finance (MEF), the Cambodian Rehabilitation and Development
Board of the Council for the Development of Cambodia (CDC/CRDB), and the
Supreme National Economic Council (SNEC). A high level steering committee
has been set up in regard to monitoring NSDP implementation and reporting.
Annex 1: NSDP Indicators to be covered in Annual Monitoring
of Progress
Core Indicators |
Included
(Y=yes, N=no) |
Responsible
institution |
Sources* |
|
Eradicate – Poverty
& Hunger |
|
|
|
1 |
Poverty levels % of
population – 2004
-- in 59% of country covered by 1993/94 survey |
N |
|
|
2 |
Poverty level %
rural population – 2004
-- in areas covered by 1993/94 |
N |
|
|
3 |
People below food
poverty line % -- 2004
-- in areas covered by 1993/94 |
N |
|
|
|
Enhance
Agricultural Production and
Diversification |
|
|
|
4 |
Paddy yield per
hectare (tons) |
Y |
MAFF |
MAIS |
5 |
Irrigated area –
including supplemental irrign., (% of rice area) |
Y |
MAFF |
MAIS |
6 |
Land Reforms: Land
Tittles to farmers -- % of Total agri. land |
Y |
MLMUPC |
MAIS |
|
Improvements in
Health |
|
|
|
7 |
Infant Mortality
Rate per 1,000 live births |
N |
|
|
8 |
> 5 Mortality Rate
per 1,000 live births |
N |
|
|
9 |
maternal Mortality
per 100,000 live births |
N |
|
|
10 |
Births attended by
skilled health personnel -- % |
Y |
|
|
11 |
HIV/AIDS
prevalence, % of adults 15-49 |
Y |
NAA |
MAIS |
12 |
Malaria Cases –
fatality % |
Y |
MOH |
MAIS |
13 |
TB smear positive
cases, per 100,000 |
Y |
MOH |
MAIS |
14 |
Married women using
modem birth spacing methods (%) |
Y |
MOH |
MAIS |
15 |
% of health
facilities providing reproductive health
services |
Y |
MOH |
MAIS |
|
Improvements in
Education (*) |
|
|
|
16 |
Net Enrolment:
Primary School – Total; Boys; Girls --% |
Y |
MOEYS |
MAIS |
17 |
Net Enrolment:
Lower Sec. Schools – Total; Boys; Girls -- % |
Y |
MOEYS |
MAIS |
18 |
Survival rate %:
1-6: |
Y |
MOEYS |
MAIS |
19 |
Survival rate %:
1-9: |
Y |
MOEYS |
MAIS |
20 |
6-14 years out of
school (%) |
N |
|
|
|
Rural Development |
|
|
|
21 |
Rural Roads
rehabilitated – Kms (out of total 28,000) |
Y |
MRD |
MAIS |
22 |
Safe Drinking water
access -- % rural population |
N |
|
|
23 |
Sanitation Access
-- % rural population |
N |
|
|
|
Environmental
Sustainability (*) |
|
|
|
24 |
Forest Cover -- %
of total area |
Y |
MAFF |
MAIS |
25 |
Fuel Wood
dependency: Households -- % |
N |
|
|
26 |
Access to safe
water source -- % of urban population |
N |
|
|
27 |
Access to improved
sanitation -- % or urban population |
N |
|
|
|
Gender Equity (*)1 |
|
|
|
28 |
Mainstream gender
in all spheres |
Y |
MOWA |
MAIS |
a) |
Concerned ministries/agencies have formulated their gender
mainstreaming strategic plan |
|
|
|
b) |
Concerned ministries/agencies have implemented their gender
mainstreaming strategic plan |
|
|
|
29 |
Female share of
wage employment – agriculture, industry, services (%) |
N |
|
|
30 |
Level of awareness
that violence against women is a crime (%) |
N |
|
|
|
Reforms |
|
|
|
31 |
Accelerate
Governance Reforms |
N |
|
|
a) |
Finalize and approve Anti-corruption Law, based on best
international practices |
Y |
MNASRI,
COM |
|
b) |
Prepare and submit for National Assembly approval a set of
Organic Laws on democratic development at sub-national levels |
Y |
IMC |
|
|
Sustain high
Macro-Economic Growth (*) |
|
|
|
32 |
Annual GDP Growth
at constant prices - % |
Y |
NIS |
MAIS |
33 |
Per Capita GDP at
constant prices (000 Riels) |
Y |
NIS |
MAIS |
34 |
Rate of Inflation % |
Y |
NIS |
MAIS |
|
Improve Budget
Performance |
|
|
|
35 |
Total Government
budget revenues - % of GDP |
Y |
MEF |
MAIS |
36 |
Total Government
budget expenditure --% of GDP |
Y |
MEF |
MAIS |
|
Accelerate
Industrial Growth & Employment |
|
|
|
37 |
Annual Growth in
manufacturing – constant prices (%) |
Y |
MIME |
MAIS |
38 |
Working children
aged 5-17 year --% |
N |
|
|
|
Tourism |
|
|
|
39 |
Annual Tourist
arrivals nos – 000s |
Y |
MOT |
MAIS |
|
De-mining. Victim
Assistance (*) |
|
|
|
40 |
Casualties (deaths
and injuries) nos. |
Y |
CMMA |
MAIS |
41 |
Area affected
cleared of mines and UXOs --% |
Y |
CMMA |
MAIS |
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
|
42 |
Length of paved
roads (primary & secondary) out of 11,300 – kms |
Y |
MPWT |
MAIS |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
43 |
Per capita use of
electricity – Kwh |
Y |
MIME |
MAIS |
Note: MAIS=Ministry/agency’s
administrative information system.
Annex 2: Role and
Responsibilities of the Ministries and Agencies in the Preparation of the
Annual Monitoring Progress Report
Issue/area |
Responsible institutions (s) |
Time frame |
The degree of
alignment of the allocation and disbursement of financial resources
in the National Budget with the Sectoral priorities targeted in the
NSDP. |
MEF |
To be sent to MOP by
31 January |
The degree of
alignment of pledges and disbursements by development partners with
Sectoral priorities targeted in the NSDP (Table 5.2 of NSDP). |
CDC/CRDB |
To be sent to MOP by
31 January |
Progress in
implementing key strategies and actions in various sectors outlined
in NSDP, in particular preparation of sector plans at the national
and sub-national levels, where they do not exist at the present
time. |
Concerned line ministries/agencies |
To be sent to MOP by
31 January |
Assessment of
progress made in achieving selected core indicators of NSDP (Table
3.2 of NSDP). |
Concerned line ministries/agencies |
To be sent to MOP by
31 January |
Recommendations
and proposed adjustments in NSDP. |
Concerned line ministries/agencies |
To be sent to MOP by
31 January |
Preparation of
first draft of Annual Monitoring/Progress Report |
MOP |
28 February |
Presentation and
discussion with PPR TWG on the draft report |
MOP |
First week of March |
Presentation and
discussion on the draft report at a meeting with ministries and
agencies |
MOP |
First week of March |
Review and
additional policy inputs to the draft report |
SNEC |
First week of March |
Approval of the
Annual Monitoring/Progress Report by the Royal Government |
Cabinet of the Royal Government |
Third week of March |
|