|
Six Month Progress Report of the Joint
Technical Working Groups
For the Period: December 2005 - May 2006
This questionnaire on progress made by each Joint Technical Working
Group is requested by the Secretariat of the Government-Donor
Coordination Committee (GDCC). It should be completed and submitted to
the Secretariat of the GDCC before
29 May 2006.
It will be used to prepare a summary progress report for the seventh
GDCC Meeting scheduled to be held on 14 June 2006. Please return the
completed questionnaire to H.E. Mr. Chhieng Yanara at CDC/CRDB in both
soft and hard copies.
TWG: Mine Action
A. Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans
-
Please list
below activities in the Action Plans that were scheduled to be
implemented during the last six months (December 2005 to May 2006) and
provide an update on implementation
status of these
activities.
|
Scheduled
Activities |
Implementation Status |
|
On Schedule |
Behind
Schedule |
If behind
schedule, reasons for delay |
TWG
Recommendations for GDCC Consideration, if any |
|
i. Finalize
CMAA reform (appointment of directors, budget approved, division
of responsibilities approved) |
x |
|
|
|
|
ii. Follow-up
PMAC/MAPU progress |
x |
|
|
|
|
iii. Finalize
policy for salary supplementation practices |
x |
|
|
|
|
iv. Initiate
work on a national strategy on Explosive Ordnance Disposal |
x |
|
|
|
|
v. Ongoing
monitoring of mine action operator's progress towards strategic
objectives an MDG 9 |
x |
|
|
|
|
vi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Are there any other
issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it would
like to submit for GDCC's consideration.
.........................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................
B. Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators
-
If there
are any Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 8th CG
Meeting held in March 2006 that fall within the mandate of this
TWG, please list the JMIs below and indicate progress that has been
made toward achieving the JMI targets.
|
Joint
Monitoring Indicator |
What is the
current implementation status? What are the constraints that you
are experiencing, if any? What recommendations do you have, for
GDCC consideration to resolve the identified constraints? |
|
i. No JMI for
this TWG |
|
|
ii. |
|
|
iii. |
|
C. Implementation Status of the Action Plan on
Harmonization, Alignment and Results
-
What
actions have you taken to implement the updated Harmonization,
Alignment, and Results Action Plan?
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any?
What recommendations
do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the identified
constraints?
|
Action Taken |
Update |
|
i. Mine
Action sector strategy and funding framework developed in 2005 |
Initial study
for a specific national strategy on unexploded ordnance has been
completed as scheduled and presented to the TWG in April 2006. The
strategy will be developed in the 2nd and 3rd
quarter of 2006 as scheduled. |
|
ii. New
multi-donor program signed on 21 December 2005 |
"Clearing for
Results" is a pooled funding arrangement in support of national
mine action priorities, including capacity development for the
CMAA (project implementation is entirely based on Government staff
with some technical assistance). |
|
iii. |
|
D. Resource Mobilization
-
Has the TWG
been able to mobilize the resources to implement its Action Plan for
2006?
R
yes £
no
If no, please answer
the following questions:
-
What is the
total amount of resources the TWG had estimated to implement its
Action Plan for 2006? (in USD).................
-
What is the
minimum additional amount that the TWG needs to implement its Action
Plan? (in USD)...................................
-
Which
development partners do you think would be able to provide the
required resources?...................................................
Report endorsed by:
|
