Six Month Progress Report of the Joint
Technical Working Groups
For the Period: December 2005 - May 2006
This questionnaire on progress made by each Joint Technical Working
Group is requested by the Secretariat of the Government-Donor
Coordination Committee (GDCC). It should be completed and submitted to
the Secretariat of the GDCC before
29 May 2006.
It will be used to prepare a summary progress report for the seventh
GDCC Meeting scheduled to be held on 14 June 2006. Please return the
completed questionnaire to H.E. Mr. Chhieng Yanara at CDC/CRDB in both
soft and hard copies.
TWG: Partnership and Harmonization TWG
A. Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans
-
Please list
below activities in the Action Plans that were scheduled to be
implemented during the last six months (December 2005 to May 2006) and
provide an update on implementation
status of these
activities.
Scheduled
Activities |
Implementation Status |
On Schedule |
Behind
Schedule |
If behind
schedule, reasons for delay |
TWG
Recommendations for GDCC Consideration, if any |
Development
partners review their country assistance strategies and policies
to align their assistance with NSDP priorities and sector
development plans (B.1.a.1)
|
The country
assistance strategies of development partners who have held
consultations with CDC/CRDB are generally in line with the NSDP
priorities. |
However, the
status of assistance for those development partners who do not
engage in consultations with CDC/CRDB is unknown. |
Article 13 of
the Sub-Decree #147 ANK.BK dated 29 December 2005 has mandated
CRDB/CDC:
i.
to
serve as the “ Focal Point “ and the “One-Stop Service” of the
Royal Government for donor countries, international organizations
and NGOs, as well as the “Focal Point” and “One-Stop Service” for
ministries and other government institutions in the coordination
of external aid allocation and utilization;
ii.
to
sign pursuant to the delegation of authority of the Prime Minister
and on behalf of the Royal Government, any legal agreements with
bilateral and/or multilateral development partners and
international organizations pertaining to acceptance and
allocation of external development assistance;
In para #11
of the RGC's Strategic Framework for Development Cooperation
Management it has been noted that the current practice of some
development partners to enter into agreements with individual
government ministries and agencies without any prior coordination
through the Royal Government’s designated focal point for aid
coordination, the Cambodian Rehabilitation and Development Board
at the Council for the Development of Cambodia, is a serious
problem that hampers Royal Government’s efforts to efficiently
manage its aid coordination functions. The Royal Government has
placed a high priority on all parties conforming to and complying
with the provisions of existing laws, rules and regulations.
|
|
CDC/CRDB and
development partners secure an agreement that no new parallel PIU/PMUs
will be established under new programs and projects (B.2.d.3)
|
|
|
Substantive
discussions on this topic have not yet taken place. However, as
part of work on completing the OECD/DAC questionnaire on
monitoring progress on Paris Declaration's Indicators, a small
group of donor representatives has been tasked by CDC/CRDB to
prepare an explanatory note, including the issue of PIU/PMUs for
review and approval by CDC/CRDB to facilitate the completion of
the survey questionnaire. |
|
RGC and
development partners jointly carry out a review of the
effectiveness of the TWG mechanism (E.a.2)
|
An
international consultant commissioned by CDC is currently working
on this activity in close consultations with representatives of
RGC ministries and development partners. This work is being
carried out under the umbrella of the Secretariat of the GDCC. The
first draft report for CDC/CRDB's review is expected to be
completed by end of June 2006. |
|
|
|
-
Are there any
other issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it
would like to submit for GDCC's consideration.
NO
B. Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators
-
If there
are any Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 8th CG
Meeting held in March 2006 that fall within the mandate of this
TWG, please list the JMIs below and indicate progress that has been
made toward achieving the JMI targets.
Joint
Monitoring Indicator |
What is the
current implementation status? What are the constraints that you
are experiencing, if any? What recommendations do you have, for
GDCC consideration to resolve the identified constraints? |
i. Implement
the RGC’s Strategic Framework for Development Cooperation
Management (SFDCM). |
The SFDCM
including the National Program to implement the SFDCM was approved
by RGC on 27 January 2006. The National Program is being
implemented through a Multi Donor Support Program for Aid
Coordination. Several donors have made pledges but no contribution
except UNDP
has been made so far. |
ii. Prepare
progress report on a six month basis the implementation of RGC's
Action Plan on Harmonization, Alignment and Results. |
Action Plan
on Harmonization, Alignment and Managing for Results (H-A-R) based
on the Paris Declaration was approved by RGC on 14 February 2006
after extensive consultation with donors and line ministries.
Mechanism to follow up the implementation of the H-A-R Action Plan
will be discussed at the P&H TWG meeting on 31 May 2006. |
iii. review
and strengthen aid coordination mechanisms including CG, GDCC and
TWGs. |
A review of
the GDCC-TWG mechanism is being carried out by CDC/CRDB through an
independent consultant. Once finished, the Review will document
experiences and lessons learned so far in the operation of TWGs,
GDCC and CG and outline the way forward. |
C. Implementation Status of the Action Plan on
Harmonization, Alignment and Results
-
What
actions have you taken to implement the updated Harmonization,
Alignment, and Results Action Plan?
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any?
What recommendations
do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the identified
constraints?
Action Taken |
Update |
Establish
mechanism to coordinate and facilitate the implementation of the
RGC's Action Plan on Harmonization, alignment and Results. |
An important
agenda item of the P&H TWG meeting to be held on 31 May 2006 is to
discuss and agree on a mechanism to coordinate and facilitate the
implementation of the RGC's Action Plan on Harmonization,
alignment and Results 2006-2010. |
D. Resource Mobilization
-
Has the TWG
been able to mobilize the resources to implement its Action Plan for
2006?
R
yes £
no
If no, please answer
the following questions:
-
What is the
total amount of resources the TWG had estimated to implement its
Action Plan for 2006? (in USD).................
-
What is the
minimum additional amount that the TWG needs to implement its Action
Plan? (in USD)...................................
-
Which
development partners do you think would be able to provide the
required resources?...................................................
Report endorsed by:
|