Annex TWG Progress Reports

TWG: TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ON AGRICULTURE AND WATER (TWGAW)

A.    Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans

  1. Please list below activities in the TWG Action Plans that were scheduled to be implemented during the period October 2007 to February 2008 and provide an update on implementation status of these activities.   

Scheduled Activities

Implementation Status

On Schedule

Behind Schedule

If behind schedule, reasons for delay

TWG Recommendations for GDCC consideration, if any

1.   Establishment of Task Management Support Group (TMSGs) were completed (as mentioned in previous progress report) but to have all TMSG  to be full operational, it took some time

ü

 

To have all TMSG to be full operational it took some time due to the delay in signing on the statement of principles.

 

2.   Endorsement of the ToR for the 5 programs

 

ü

The endorsement of TORs was linked to the signature of the statement of principles. However, at this moment 4 TORs have been approved except only 1.

 

3.    Recruitment of Design Team (DT)

 

ü

 

- The DT for Program # 4 – already recruited & nominated;
- The DTs for Program # 1, 2, 3- the recruitment & nomination are underway;
- Program # 5: since the TOR has not been approved then it cannot proceed to further action.

 

4.   Funding for Program Design

 

ü

So far 4 Program Designs (1, 2, 3, & 4) have almost secured funding supports. One program is still in the process of mobilizing funds from Donors.

5.   Full Technical Working Group Meeting

 

ü

originally it was planned to be held on 23 Jan 2008, it has been cancelled due to the time constraints

 

6.   Improve support for information needs of agriculture/water sector (donor’s database)

ü

 

 

 

  1. Are there any other issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it would like to submit for GDCC's consideration? Not at this stage

The TWGAW Secretariat operation is confronting with the shortage of the budget for the operation due to the expired of the support contract.

B.    Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators

  1. If there are any Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 1st CDCF in June 2007 that fall within the mandate of this TWG, please list the JMIs below and indicate progress that has been made toward achieving the JMI targets. Please take care to indicate if resource needs or appropriate timeframes still need to be identified.

Joint Monitoring Indicator

 

Timeframe

What is the current implementation status?

What are the constraints that you are experiencing, if any?

What recommendations do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the identified constraints?

1- Progressive implementation of the Strategy for Agriculture and Water

 

1. Progress towards implementation of the Strategy on Agriculture and Water (SAW), as required by the NSDP:

a) Obtaining approval by MAFF, MOWRAM and donors on the terms of reference for the design of the 5 National Programs under the SAW, by July 2007

Completion of four out of five Terms of Reference.

The other one is being discussed. The TMSG for this program design process was already nominated and operational but the constraint was that the TMSG of this program required having a lead EDP focal point in TMSG.

 

 

b) Completing the design of two National Programs by the end of December 2007,

The launching of the design process is linked to the signature of the statement of principles. Could be difficult to end 2 programs in the remaining time. No Program design was finalized by end of 2007.

Delay in the signature of the statement of principles.
Delay in the appointment of the program teams from both Ministries
Recruitment of the local experts
Budget to support design phase for 5 programs.

c)  Completing design of all 5 National Programs by the end of July 2008.

According to current design process, it is expected that 2 programs will be completed by the end of July 08, while the rests will be completed by the end of 2008.

As mentioned many times earlier, this prolonging was the result of the delay in the signature of the statement of principles.

 

2- Improved donor and government coordination

2. Ensure relevant stakeholders have up to date information on activities by posting twice each year (at end June and end December) on the TWGAW website an updated project database listing the donor and government activities in the agriculture and water sectors.

Up dated and up loaded on the TWGAW website. Roughly on schedule.

 Difficulty to get updated information from donors

C.    Implementation Status of the Action Plan on Harmonization, Alignment and Results

  1. What are the main actions have you taken to implement the Harmonization, Alignment, and Results Action Plan? What are the constraints that you are experiencing, if any?

What recommendations do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve any identified constraints?

Relevant section and sub-section of the H-A-R Action Plan

 

Action Taken

 

Constraints and/or recommendations for GDCC discussion

All new and existing funding (from Government as well as from EDPs) will progressively be aligned with the SAW priorities, and channelled through the SAW framework and its National Development Programs.

- Since the National Development Programs do not exist yet, making difficult to ensure a full H&A process.
- KOICA (MOWRAM) has been invited to the full TWGAW meeting (Aug. 07) and encouraged to be one of the Statement of Principles Signatories as well as to be part of at least one of the 5 programs;
- Facilitated WDR 2008- Agriculture for Development launch and discussion;
- Presentation of ADB agriculture sector study

 

 

- KOICA  is still staying outside the TWGAW community

D.  Resource Mobilization

  1. Please provide details of your TWG's resource mobilisation efforts since the June 2007 CDCF meeting (including identified resource needs, actual commitments and source of funds, and remaining gaps) and the extent to which these resource mobilisation efforts are linked to an Action Plan or sector programme that includes a budget framework for programming resources and activities within the domain of the TWG.

As mentioned earlier, 5 National Programs are being designed and the resources also are being mobilized. Up to now the status of the resources for each program are shown in the following table:

 

Program's Name

Total cost (USD)

Committed (USD)

Unfunded (USD)

Pro.1: Institutional Capacity Building & Management Support Program

164,600

125,000

39,600

Pro.2: Food Security Support Program (FSSP)

66,800

57,200

9,600

Pro.3: Cambodia Agriculture and Agri-Business Support Program (CAASP)

266,000

265,000

0

Pro.4: Water resources, irrigation management and land program

199,550

203,000

0

Pro.5: Cambodia Agricultural and  Water Research, Education and Extension Program (CAWREEP)

360,000

0

360,000

Total

952,950

578,200

409,200

TWGAW Secretariat

 

 

 

Funds requested from CRDB for TWGAW Secretariat Support

30,000

0

30,000

  1. Does the TWG have sufficient resources to manage the workload identified in its Annual Workplan?          No

  2. Has your TWG submitted a request for support to CDC/CRDB ?                             Yes

  3. If "No", is your TWG considering a request for support?                                        Yes  /  No

 


Home | 8th CG Meeting | 7th CG Meeting | Partnership and Harmonization TWG | GDCC | Policy Documents Guidelines | Donor Dev. Coop. Pgm. | NGO