Annex TWG Progress Reports
TWG: TECHNICAL WORKING
GROUP ON AGRICULTURE AND WATER (TWGAW)
A. Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans
-
Please list
below activities in the TWG Action Plans that were scheduled to be
implemented during the period October 2007 to February 2008 and provide
an update on implementation status of these activities.
Scheduled
Activities |
Implementation
Status |
On Schedule |
Behind Schedule |
If behind
schedule, reasons for delay |
TWG
Recommendations for GDCC consideration, if any |
1.
Establishment of Task Management Support Group (TMSGs) were completed
(as mentioned in previous progress report) but to have all TMSG to be
full operational, it took some time |
ü |
|
To have all TMSG
to be full operational it took some time
due to the delay in signing on the statement of principles. |
|
2. Endorsement
of the ToR for the 5 programs |
|
ü |
The endorsement of TORs was linked to the signature of the statement
of principles. However, at this moment 4 TORs have been approved
except only 1. |
|
3. Recruitment
of Design Team (DT)
|
ü |
|
- The DT for Program # 4 – already recruited & nominated;
- The DTs for Program # 1, 2, 3- the recruitment & nomination are
underway;
- Program # 5: since the TOR has not been approved then it cannot
proceed to further action. |
|
4. Funding
for Program Design |
|
ü |
So far 4 Program Designs (1, 2, 3, & 4) have almost secured funding
supports. One program is still in the process of mobilizing funds from
Donors. |
5. Full
Technical Working Group Meeting |
|
ü |
originally it was planned to be held on 23 Jan 2008, it has been
cancelled due to the time constraints |
|
6. Improve
support for information needs of agriculture/water sector (donor’s
database) |
ü |
|
|
|
-
Are there any other
issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it would
like to submit for GDCC's consideration?
Not
at this stage
The TWGAW
Secretariat operation is confronting with the shortage of the budget for
the operation due to the expired of the support contract.
B. Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators
-
If there are
any
Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 1st CDCF in June 2007
that fall within the mandate of this TWG, please list the JMIs
below and indicate progress that has been made toward achieving the JMI
targets. Please take care to indicate if resource needs or
appropriate timeframes still need to be identified.
Joint Monitoring
Indicator |
Timeframe |
What is the
current implementation status? |
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any? |
What
recommendations do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the
identified constraints? |
1- Progressive implementation of the Strategy for Agriculture and
Water
|
1. Progress towards implementation of the Strategy
on Agriculture and Water (SAW), as required by the NSDP:
a) Obtaining approval by MAFF, MOWRAM and donors
on the terms of reference for the design of the 5 National Programs
under the SAW, by July 2007 |
Completion of four out of
five Terms of Reference. |
The other one is
being discussed. The TMSG for this program design process was already
nominated and operational but the constraint was that the TMSG of this
program required having a lead EDP focal point in TMSG. |
|
|
|
|
|
b) Completing the
design of two National Programs by the end of December 2007,
|
The launching of the design process is linked to the signature of the
statement of principles. Could be difficult to end 2 programs in the
remaining time.
No Program design was
finalized by end of 2007. |
Delay in the signature of the statement of principles.
Delay in the appointment of the program teams from both Ministries
Recruitment of the local experts
Budget to support design phase for 5 programs. |
c) Completing design
of all 5 National Programs by the end of July 2008. |
According to current design process, it is expected that 2 programs
will be completed by the end of July 08, while the rests will be
completed by the end of 2008. |
As mentioned many times earlier, this prolonging was the result of the
delay in the signature of the statement of principles.
|
2- Improved donor and government coordination |
2. Ensure relevant stakeholders have up to date information on
activities by posting twice each year (at end June and end
December) on the TWGAW website an updated project database listing
the donor and government activities in the agriculture and water
sectors. |
Up dated and up loaded on the TWGAW website. Roughly on schedule. |
Difficulty to get updated information from donors |
C. Implementation Status of the Action Plan on
Harmonization, Alignment and Results
-
What are the
main actions have you taken to implement the Harmonization, Alignment,
and Results Action Plan?
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any?
What recommendations do
you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve any identified constraints?
Relevant
section and sub-section of the H-A-R Action Plan |
Action Taken |
Constraints
and/or recommendations for GDCC discussion |
All new and
existing funding (from Government as well as from EDPs) will
progressively be aligned with the SAW priorities, and channelled
through the SAW framework and its National Development Programs. |
- Since the National Development Programs do not
exist yet, making difficult to ensure a full H&A process.
- KOICA (MOWRAM) has been invited to the full TWGAW meeting (Aug.
07) and encouraged to be one of the Statement of Principles
Signatories as well as to be part of at least one of the 5 programs;
- Facilitated WDR 2008- Agriculture for Development launch and
discussion;
- Presentation of ADB agriculture sector study |
- KOICA is still staying outside the TWGAW community |
D. Resource Mobilization
-
Please
provide details of your TWG's resource mobilisation efforts since the
June 2007 CDCF meeting (including identified resource needs, actual
commitments and source of funds, and remaining gaps) and the extent to
which these resource mobilisation efforts are linked to an Action Plan
or sector programme that includes a budget framework for programming
resources and activities within the domain of the TWG.
As mentioned earlier, 5
National Programs are being designed and the resources also are being
mobilized. Up to now the status of the resources for each program are
shown in the following table:
Program's Name |
Total cost (USD) |
Committed (USD) |
Unfunded (USD) |
Pro.1: Institutional Capacity
Building & Management Support Program |
164,600 |
125,000 |
39,600 |
Pro.2: Food Security Support Program
(FSSP) |
66,800 |
57,200 |
9,600 |
Pro.3: Cambodia Agriculture and Agri-Business
Support Program (CAASP) |
266,000 |
265,000 |
0 |
Pro.4: Water resources, irrigation
management and land program |
199,550 |
203,000 |
0 |
Pro.5: Cambodia Agricultural and
Water Research, Education and Extension Program (CAWREEP) |
360,000 |
0 |
360,000 |
Total |
952,950 |
578,200 |
409,200 |
TWGAW Secretariat |
|
|
|
Funds requested from CRDB for TWGAW
Secretariat Support |
30,000 |
0 |
30,000 |
-
Does the TWG
have sufficient resources to manage the workload identified in its
Annual Workplan?
No
-
Has your TWG
submitted a request for support to CDC/CRDB
? Yes
-
If "No", is
your TWG considering a request for
support?
Yes / No
|