|
Annex TWG Progress Reports
TWG: MINE ACTION TWG
A. Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans
-
Please list
below activities in the TWG Action Plans for 2007 and 2008 that were
scheduled to be implemented during the period October 2007 to February
2008 and provide an update on implementation status of these activities.
|
Scheduled
Activities |
Implementation
Status |
|
On Schedule |
Behind Schedule |
If behind
schedule, reasons for delay |
TWG
Recommendations for GDCC consideration, if any |
|
Establish TWG
Secretariat and discuss composition and function with TWG members |
X |
|
|
|
|
Prepare agenda and
other documents for each meeting; |
X |
|
|
|
|
Attend three CDC
courses on Resource Mobilization and HAR |
X |
|
|
|
Prepare progress
reports on public investment plan of mine action for the Royal
Government and development partners through the Cambodian Development
Council and the Ministry of Planning; |
X |
|
|
|
Serve as a focal
point in preparing counterpart funds for mine action and monitor
implementation |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Are there any other
issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it would
like to submit for GDCC's consideration?
B. Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators
-
If there are
any
Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 1st CDCF in June 2007
that fall within the mandate of this TWG, please list the JMIs
below and indicate progress that has been made toward achieving the JMI
targets. Please take care to indicate if resource needs or
appropriate timeframes still need to be identified.
|
Joint Monitoring
Indicator |
Timeframe |
What
is the current implementation status? |
What
are the constraints that you are experiencing, if any? |
What
recommendations do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the
identified constraints? |
|
Further reduction
of 70-80 landmine/ERW casualties and a decrease of 5-10% of
contaminated land |
Jan-Dec 2007 |
There were a
total of 347 casualties during 2007, which is a reduction of 103 (or
22.8%) from 2006. Additionally, 366.4 sq km have been marked as
reclaimed by MAG and HALO with 33.7 sq km cleared by the three
operators. This represents a reduction of 400.1 sq km from the L1S,
or a decrease of 9% of contaminated land. |
|
|
C. Implementation Status of the Action Plan on
Harmonization, Alignment and Results
-
What are the
main actions have you taken to implement the Harmonization, Alignment,
and Results Action Plan?
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any?
What recommendations do
you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve any identified constraints?
|
Relevant section
and sub-section of the H-A-R Action Plan |
Action Taken |
Constraints
and/or recommendations for GDCC discussion |
|
|
Continued
discussions with stakeholders moving forward with using a
Programme-based approach for Mine Action. Geneva International Centre
for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) approached to provide technical
assistance. |
Some disagreement
within the sector about the most appropriate way to move forward with
it. GDCC may consider the establishment of permanent capacity to
assist TWG’s/sector in developing a PBA/SWAP through in-house
expertise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Resource Mobilization
-
Please
provide details of your TWG's resource mobilisation efforts since the
June 2007 CDCF meeting (including identified resource needs, actual
commitments and source of funds, and remaining gaps) and the extent to
which these resource mobilisation efforts are linked to an Action Plan
or sector programme that includes a budget framework for programming
resources and activities within the domain of the TWG.
-
Does the TWG
have sufficient resources to manage the workload identified in its
Annual Workplan?
Yes / No
-
Has your TWG
submitted a request for support to CDC/CRDB
? Yes / No
-
If "No", is
your TWG considering a request for
support?
Yes / No
|
