Annex TWG Progress Reports
TWG: PAR (NB: CDC
added)
A. Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans
THE PAR TWG HAS BEEN
INACTIVE SINCE THE RESIGNATION OF THE CO-LEAD COORDINATOR IN EARLY 2007.
NEVERTHELESS THE CAR SECRETARIAT HAS CONTINUED TO WORK TOWARDS ACHIEVING
THE AGREED JMIs. WORK IS ONGOING TO FINALIZE POLICIES ON THE MANAGEMENT
AND DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT. WORK IS ALSO
PROCEEDING TOWARDS DEVELOPING A MEDIUM TERM REMUNERATION POLICY.
-
Please list
below activities in the TWG Action Plans for 2007 and 2008 that were
scheduled to be implemented during the period October 2007 to February
2008 and provide an update on implementation status of these activities.
Scheduled
Activities |
Implementation
Status |
On Schedule |
Behind Schedule |
If behind
schedule, reasons for delay |
TWG
Recommendations for GDCC consideration, if any |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Are there any other
issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it would
like to submit for GDCC's consideration?
B. Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators
-
If there are
any
Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 1st CDCF in June 2007
that fall within the mandate of this TWG, please list the JMIs
below and indicate progress that has been made toward achieving the JMI
targets. Please take care to indicate if resource needs or
appropriate timeframes still need to be identified.
THE JMIs AGREED TO IN
JUNE 2007 WERE THE SAME AS THOSE AGREED AT THE LAST CG MEETING IN 2006.
Joint Monitoring
Indicator |
Timeframe |
What is the
current implementation status? |
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any? |
What
recommendations do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the
identified constraints? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Implementation Status of the Action Plan on
Harmonization, Alignment and Results
-
What are the
main actions have you taken to implement the Harmonization, Alignment,
and Results Action Plan?
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any?
What recommendations do
you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve any identified constraints?
THE CAR SECRETARIAT,
TOGETHER WITH MEF, UNDERTOOK CONSULTATIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS TO
CLARIFY THE USE, ESTABLISHMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF MPBIs AS SUGGESTED BY THE
PRIME MINISTER AT THE JUNE 2007 CDCF MEETING
-
A FIRST NATIONAL SEMINAR WAS HELD IN OCTOBER 2007 TO LAY
DOWN CORE PRINCIPLES
-
ONGOING CONSULTATIONS WERE HELD WITH DPs TO IDENTIFY
ELEMENTS OF A CONSENSUS CONCERNING THE USE OF PMGs AND MBPIs
-
A MEETING CHAIRED BY THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND
CHAIRMAN OF THE CAR INVOLVING REPRESENTATIVES FROM MINISTRIES AND DPs
WAS HELD ON FEBRUARY 26 TO FIRM UP THE CONSENSUS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION
TO AMENDING ANUKRET 98.
-
A REVISED ANUKRET 98 REFLECTING THE CONSENSUS IS NOW
BEING DRAFTED AND SHOULD BE READY IN EARLY MARCH FOLLOWING THE GDCC
MEETING.
-
A SECOND
NATIONAL SEMINAR WILL BE HELD IN MID-MARCH TO DISSEMINATE THE REVISED
ANUKRET AND INFORM PARTICIPANTS ON A STREAMLINED PMG SCHEME AND A NEW
MECHANISM TO ENHANCE SERVICE DELIVERY: THE SPECIAL OPERATING AGENCY
SCHEME.
Relevant section
and sub-section of the H-A-R Action Plan |
Action Taken |
Constraints
and/or recommendations for GDCC discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Resource Mobilization
-
Please
provide details of your TWG's resource mobilisation efforts since the
June 2007 CDCF meeting (including identified resource needs, actual
commitments and source of funds, and remaining gaps) and the extent to
which these resource mobilisation efforts are linked to an Action Plan
or sector programme that includes a budget framework for programming
resources and activities within the domain of the TWG.
THE TWG HAS BEEN
INACTIVE. FRANCE HAS PROVIDED TARGETED SUPPORT TO ASSIST THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY ON PUBLIC SERVICES DELIVERY BY FINANCING THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A SPECIAL OPERATING AGENCY PILOT FOR HEALTH CENTERS AND THE
PREPARATION OF A COMPENDIUM OF CORE INFORMATION ON PUBLIC SERVICES.
-
Does the TWG
have sufficient resources to manage the workload identified in its
Annual Workplan? No
THE TWG IS INACTIVE. HOWEVER, EFFORTS ARE ONGOING TO REVIVE
IT. EXPERIENCE SHOWS THAT THE TWG HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO MOBILIZE REQUIRED
RESOURCES TO IMPLEMENT THE WORKPLAN ON TIME . THE CAR SECRETARIAT IS
PREPARING A SUBMISSION TO CDC TO ACCESS FUNDS TO OPERATE A SMALL
SECRETARIAT TO SUPPORT THE TWG ONCE IT IS OPERATIONAL IN THE COMING
MONTHS.
-
Has your TWG
submitted a request for support to CDC/CRDB
? No
A REQUEST WILL BE SUBMITTED IN COMING DAYS
-
If "No", is
your TWG considering a request for
support?
Yes
|