Annex TWG Progress Reports
TWG: PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT REFORM PROGRAM
A. Progress in Implementing TWG's Action Plans
-
Please list
below activities in the TWG Action Plans for 2007 and 2008 that were
scheduled to be implemented during the period October 2007 to February
2008 and provide an update on implementation status of these activities.
Scheduled
Activities |
Implementation
Status |
On Schedule |
Behind Schedule |
If behind
schedule, reasons for delay |
TWG
Recommendations for GDCC consideration, if any |
-
Continue
implementing key remaining action plan necessary to complete
platform one:
-
Continue
improve cash management
-
Continue
improve debt management
-
Continue
streamlining budget execution procedure in line with FMIS.
-
Continue
improve budget comprehensiveness and integration.
-
Continue
improve revenue policy and forecasting.
|
a, b on schedule |
c, d, e behind
schedule |
These activities
need longer time for implementation. |
These activities
will be continued in Stage 2/Platform 2 |
-
Preparing
Consolidated Action Plan for Stage 2 (CAP2):
-
Platform 1
activities to be strengthened in stage 2
-
Platform 2
activities to be implemented in stage 2
-
Later platforms
to be commenced now.
|
On schedule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Are there any other
issues affecting the implementation of TWG Action Plan that it would
like to submit for GDCC's consideration?
B. Progress on Joint Monitoring Indicators
-
If there are
any
Joint Monitoring Indicator(s) agreed at the 1st CDCF in June 2007
that fall within the mandate of this TWG, please list the JMIs
below and indicate progress that has been made toward achieving the JMI
targets. Please take care to indicate if resource needs or
appropriate timeframes still need to be identified.
Joint Monitoring
Indicator |
Timeframe |
What
is the current implementation status? |
What
are the constraints that you are experiencing, if any? |
What
recommendations do you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve the
identified constraints? |
Continue
implementing the PFMRP (by sustaining actions already
implemented, by completing the remaining key actions necessary for
Platform 1,and by preparing the consolidated action plan for
implementation of Stage
2/Platform 2) and continue monitoring impact through the agreed PFM
Performance
Indicators. |
Platform 1/ stage
1 completed by December 2007
Platform 2/Stage 2 Consolidated Action Plan has been prepared.
|
On schedule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Implementation Status of the Action Plan on
Harmonization, Alignment and Results
-
What are the
main actions have you taken to implement the Harmonization, Alignment,
and Results Action Plan?
What are the
constraints that you are experiencing, if any?
What recommendations do
you have, for GDCC consideration to resolve any identified constraints?
Relevant section
and sub-section of the H-A-R Action Plan |
Action Taken |
Constraints
and/or recommendations for GDCC discussion |
Ownership |
PFMRP –
Consolidated Action Plan for Stage 2 in Place.
PFMRP MDTF and Co Financing IDA Grant in Place
MEF PFM Reform Committee leads Reform Programme Implementation |
Work ongoing to
incorporate NAA into mini swap. |
Alignment |
PFMRP represents
coordinated assistance by the DP to RGC PFM programme
PFM Assessment methodology built into programme indicator set.
Annual Retreat and external reviews
Majority of aid untied some small scale bilateral components |
|
Harmonization |
Full PFM Swap |
|
D. Resource Mobilization
-
Please
provide details of your TWG's resource mobilisation efforts since the
June 2007 CDCF meeting (including identified resource needs, actual
commitments and source of funds, and remaining gaps) and the extent to
which these resource mobilisation efforts are linked to an Action Plan
or sector programme that includes a budget framework for programming
resources and activities within the domain of the TWG On going Program
-
Does the TWG
have sufficient resources to manage the workload identified in its
Annual Workplan? Yes
-
Has your TWG
submitted a request for support to CDC/CRDB
? No
-
If "No", is
your TWG considering a request for
support?
No
|