TERMS OF REFERENCE
Government-Donor Partnership Working Group
BACKGROUND
1. At the 6th Consultative Group Meeting held
in June 2002, the RGC reported on progress that has been made in building
partnerships with national and external development partners of Cambodia.
A paper entitled, “Building Development Partnerships: An Update” was
distributed by the RGC. It presented a summary of RGC’s overall objective,
guiding principles, and strategic implementation considerations for
building development partnerships (see Annex I). It also outlined the
specific measures and mechanisms that have been put in place to strengthen
partnerships with national stakeholders within the Government, the private
sector, and the civil society. Specifically, the progress that has been
made in fostering partnerships within the Government through the
Inter-Ministerial Steering Committee to Strengthen Development Cooperation
partnerships that was established in 2001 and serves as the focal point on
partnership issues; the “Government-Private Sector Forum” established in
1999 that is the formal mechanism for fostering partnership with the
private sector; and the civil society.
2. To further strengthen partnerships with its external
development partners, the RGC had asked for the formation of a
“Government-Donor Partnership Working Group” under the CG mechanism to
address issues and make recommendations on appropriate approaches for
building meaningful and effective development partnerships with its
external partners.
The RGC
proposed that this working Group should be Co-Chaired by one
representative of the bi-laterals and one representative of the
multi-laterals and the Government. The RGC
also
recommended that the size of this Working Group should be
kept small to ensure maximum efficiency
and that the Working Group should begin its work as soon as possible by: (i)
developing the Terms of Reference for its operations, and (ii) preparing
an action plan to resolve problems for which feasible solutions can be
agreed to and implemented immediately. The Working Group will report
at both the CG and the Post-CG Meetings on progress made in dealing with
Government-Donor Partnership issues in the same manner as other Working
Groups under the CG mechanism.
3. The 6th CG Meeting overwhelmingly endorsed
RGC’s proposal on the formation of the “Government-Donor Partnership
Working Group”. At the CG Meeting it was understood that this Working
Group will be chaired by the Government and will have two Co-Vice Chairs.
Japan and UN Resident Coordinator were designated as the Co-Vice Chairs to
liaise with the bi-lateral and multi-lateral donors, respectively. Soon
after the 6th CG Meeting, H.E. the Prime Minister designated
the Secretary General of the CDC/CRDB, who is also the Secretary General
of the Inter-Ministerial Steering Committee, to be the Government’s
representative and Chairman of the Working Group. A meeting of the Chair
and the two Co-Vice Chairs was held on August 19, 2002 at the CDC. At this
meeting it was agreed that:
|
i |
In
accordance with the decisions at the 6th CG Meeting, the
size of the Working Group will be kept small to ensure maximum
efficiency. However, interested donors and Government representatives
will be invited to participate as members of the Sub-Groups that may
be established to oversee the work on specific issues. It was agreed
between the Chair and two Vice-Chairs, that the membership of the
Working Group will include: |
|
|
|
|
one member from IFIs. |
|
|
|
|
one member from among bi-lateral donors from the region,
and |
|
|
|
|
one member from among
bi-lateral donors that have a stated policy to channel their ODA
through multi-lateral institutions.
|
|
ii |
The
Chairman was to contact ADB, Australia, and United Kingdom to explore
their interest in participating as a member of the Working Group.
|
|
iii |
The TORs for the Working Group should be flexible, to
enable the Working Group to examine current critical issues. The four
topics proposed in the draft TORs that was circulated were agreed to
with a recommendation to change the title of item III to something
like “National Operational Guidelines for Development Cooperation”. It
was also agreed that TORs will be reviewed and finalized at the first
meeting of the Group.
|
4. The first meeting of the core Government-Donor
Partnership Working Group was held on November 8, 2002 at CDC at which
the draft of the TORs were reviewed. The TORs for the Working Group
presented here incorporate the decisions made at this meeting.
5.
The membership of the
core Government-Donor Partnership Working Group as of 8 November 2002
included: |
|
|
|
Government |
Chair |
|
|
|
Japan |
Co-vice Chair |
|
|
|
UN Resident
Coordinator |
Co-vice Chair |
|
|
|
ADB |
Member |
|
|
|
Australia |
Member |
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
Member
|
6. At a meeting with all development partners
held on 28 February 2003 at CDC, a decision was made to expand the
membership of the Working Group. In response to a request from the
Chairman, as of 21 March 2003, the following development partners
have also indicated an interest in participating in the work of
the Group: Canada, Denmark, European Commission, France, Germany,
and Sweden.
MANDATE AND
ACTIVITIES OF THE WORKING GROUP
7. The mandate of the Working Group is to
examine issues related to Government-Donor Partnerships, make
recommendations to strengthen the partnerships, and to follow up
and report on progress made at both the CG and the Post-CG
Meetings.
8. The Working Groups will focus on identifying,
analyzing, and making recommendations on issues for which feasible
solutions can be agreed to and implemented immediately.
9. As suggested in the RGC’s paper, “Building
Development Cooperation Partnerships: An Update” there
are several steps that can be taken in the short
term, which could increase the national ownership of the
development cooperation activities, lessen the burden on
implementing agencies, and minimize the unintended adverse effects
of some donor practices, notably those related to capacity
building. The Government-Donor Partnership Working Group will
begin its work by examining the issues and making recommendations
in the following four areas:
|
|
i |
A
harmonized approach for capacity development:
The existing gaps and limitations of capacity within the
administrative structures of the Government as well as the
implications of these constraints for effectively managing and
enforcing reforms are now well recognized. While the current
practices of donors of providing salary incentives within the
context of the implementation of individual programs/projects may
expedite the implementation of these programs/projects, these
practices have been detrimental in building sustainable
institutional capacities.
There is a need for a study that will: (i)
document the existing capacity building practices of the donors;
and (ii) outline options and make recommendations on feasible
solutions that can be implemented immediately to minimize the
existing problems.
A
Sub-Committee of the Working Group will be established to oversee
the conduct of the study. The UNDP Support Programme for Aid
Coordination and Partnerships has allocated resources for carrying
out this study.
The
Sub-Committee will periodically report to the Working Group on the
progress in the conduct of the study.
|
|
ii |
A
harmonized approach for program formulation, review, and
implementation management strategies:
The RGC would like to see a flexible approach adopted in the
design of development programs/projects. In the design of the
programs, the approach should put emphasis on process and results
as opposed to providing a rigid blue print for implementation. As
a rule, the program design should include mechanisms that ensure
periodic reviews and well-defined processes to realign
program/project activities necessary for achieving program/project
results in response to changing conditions. There have been many
attempts and successes in formulating programs and projects
jointly by the Government and some donors. Many donors have also
begun to make long-term commitments to support specific programs
and projects. This is encouraging because such long-term
commitments enable the RGC to plan for its development activities
in a more systematic manner. By documenting the successes and
lessons learned in these areas, the successful experiences can be
institutionalized through a collaborative effort.
There is a need to carry out a comprehensive
assessment of: (i) the existing practices of the bi-lateral and
multi-lateral donors in Cambodia and lessons learned from
experiences over the last decade; and (ii) to outline feasible
options and recommendations that can improve upon the current
situation.
A
Sub-Committee of the Working Group will be established to oversee
the conduct of the study. Japan has agreed to field a mission to
conduct this study.
The Sub-Committee will periodically report to
the Working Group on the progress in the conduct of the study.
|
|
iii |
Preparation of “National Operational Guidelines
for Development Cooperation”: The
need for giving the ownership of the development processes to the
national Government’s is now well recognized in practically all
international forums on development cooperation. In Cambodia, a
large number of programs financed by various donors are now
designated as “nationally executed”. However, at present there are
no ”National Operational Guidelines” for managing the
implementation of development cooperation programs designated as
NEX. To ensure some uniformity in the management of the nationally
executed programs across Government ministries/agencies that are
funded by various donors, there is a need to develop a manual on
“National Operational Guidelines for Development Cooperation” that
recognize both Government policies and procedures, and the
realities of donor practices in Cambodia. Such a manual should
cover all aspects of program implementation management.
A Sub-Committee of the Working Group will be
established to oversee the preparation of the manual on “National
Operational Guidelines for Development Cooperation”. The UNDP
Support Programme for Aid Coordination and Partnerships has
allocated resources for carrying out this study.
The Sub-Committee will periodically report to the
Working Group on the progress in the conduct of the study.
|
|
iv |
Information sharing between Government and the national and
external development partners:
An effective
information sharing strategy can significantly enhance the
opportunities for participation of all stakeholders in the
development processes. The Working Group will provide direction
for developing an effective information sharing strategy to
enhance the participation of all national and external development
partners of Cambodia.
|
OPERATIONS OF THE WORKING GROUP
10. The
need for more strengthened and effective donor-donor coordination among
bi-lateral and multi-lateral development partners of Cambodia is well
recognized. The Government encourages the two Co-vice Chairs to make use
of any mechanisms that will enable them to secure the views and concerns
of all development partners within their constituencies. For its part the
Government’s representative as the Chair of the Working Group will make an
effort to keep all bilateral and multilateral development partners
informed by circulating the agenda of the scheduled meetings as well as
the decisions/conclusions of the Working Group meetings through e-mail and
by posting the information on its website (www.cdc-crdb.gov.kh).
In addition to the members of the Working Group any donor can attend the
Working Group meetings who has an interest in a topic scheduled to be
discussed by the Working Group.
|
ANNEX I
RGC’s OVERALL OBJECTIVE,
GUIDING PRINCIPLES, AND
STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS IN
BUILDING DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION PARTNERSHIPS
OVERALL OBJECTIVE
The RGC’s overall objective of building development cooperation
partnerships is to further support Cambodia’s sustainable socio-economic
development with equity to reduce poverty by effectively promoting and
supporting the emerging partnership model of development cooperation,
based on Cambodian leadership, ownership, and accountability, thus
contributing to increased effectiveness of development resources, to
increased resource mobilization, and to a sharper focus of development
cooperation on human development, poverty reduction, and participatory
decentralized development.
|
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
|
|
|
|
A Common
Vision and Shared Objectives. |
|
|
|
Agreed
Governance and Accountability Structures. |
|
|
|
Harmonized
Strategic Management and Operational Capacities. |
|
|
|
Learning
and Adaptation Capacities. |
|
|
|
Building
and Maintaining Trust. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STRATEGIC
IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
|
Ownership,
Commitment and Shared Resources. |
|
|
|
Flexible
Partnership Modalities. |
|
|
|
Starting
Gradually, Getting Priorities Right and Using Pilots. |
|
|
|
Identifying and Differentiating Partner Roles. |
|
|
|
Developing
National (in-country) Coordination Capacities. |
|
|
|
Strengthening External Donor Capacities for Aid Management &
Coordination. |
|
|
|
Implications for Good Governance and Administration Reform.
|
|
|
|