Executive Summary
CAMBODIA
Sustaining Growth in a
Challenging Environment
Discussion Draft
December 2008
Note: the findings, interpretations, and
conclusions expressed in this document are entirely those of the authors) and
are not necessarily of the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or
members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries then represents.
The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this
document and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their
use
Sustaining Growth in
a Challenging Environment
Executive Summary
-
Many countries succeed in generating high economic growth at some
point in their history, but only a very few manage to sustain rapid
growth for an extended period. Only such a prolonged period of rapid
growth can have a significant impact on income per capita, and such an
impact often brings with it many other important changes to people's
lives.
-
Cambodia has been one of the countries in this select group. It
has more than doubled its income per capita over the past decade. This
doubling has been accompanied by the trappings of a profound structural
transformation: integration into the global economy; a shift of jobs
from agriculture to manufacturing; a demographic transition; and
migration from rural to urban areas. Translating into jobs and better
services, these outcomes have led to a significant reduction in poverty,
as well as improvements in health and education.
-
Even so, the next episode in this story is very uncertain. The
achievements of the past decade are very fragile and leave many
Cambodians poor and with few assets. The base for this economic growth
appears narrow. And the winds that once served Cambodia well-global
trade and investment flows-seem to have lost their strength, at least
temporarily.
-
What will it take for Cambodia to continue on this trajectory, to
become a middle income country in a decade or so, and lift more of its
people out of poverty? This report aims to contribute to policymakers’
and citizens’ thinking about growth in Cambodia in three ways: (i) it
reviews the experience of the past decade and draws the
Cambodia-specific lessons of this period; (ii) it sketches the major
potential sources of growth with the aim of assessing the barriers to
growth; and (iii) it outlines policy options for addressing these
barriers.
-
The analysis has three main messages. First, the economic growth
of the past decade is a remarkable achievement, but it is unlikely to be
sustainable in its current form. That said, the experience has
established that growth in some sectors can be stimulated by good
policies and governance arrangements. Second, Cambodia has a potential
to sustain growth if it increases competitiveness and diversifies. This
requires a focused growth strategy. Finally, Cambodia has three
important opportunities: harnessing regional integration; managing
natural resources in a sustainable way; and investing in its future
(through agriculture, infrastructure, education, and higher savings).
-
This analysis builds on recent developments in thinking about
growth, in particular the report of the 2008 Report of the Growth
Commission. The approach used here is to undertake some detective work
on what works and does not work in the Cambodian context, to propose a
diagnostic on the key constraints on growth, and to pinpoint the actions
that hold most promise for sustaining growth. It readily acknowledges
that much remains unknown about the process of growth and development;
and thus takes the view that experimentation, monitoring, and evaluation
will be key components of a successful strategy.
Understanding a Decade
of Rapid Growth
-
Four features of this decade of rapid growth are of particular
significance (Chapter 1). First, growth has been driven by an open economy and a stable macroeconomic environment. These
macroeconomic features are visible in the rapid increases in exports and
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and the relative stability of inflation
and the exchange rate. Second, stable macroeconomic management has been
achieved with very fern policy instruments. Indeed, the economy is
largely dollarized, leaving fiscal policy as the main instrument in the
policy mix. Third, growth has been narrowly based. The four leading
sectors have been garments, tourism, construction, and agriculture. Very
little diversification has occurred beyond them: garment products
account for 88 percent of all exports. Fourth, the levels of domestic
savings and investment are low, though increasing. While this was to
be expected given the initial conditions of Cambodia in the 1990s, it
differs from other experiences of rapid growth, in particular in East
Asia. Related to this is the recent and very rapid development of the
financial sector, from a very low base, mobilizing well-needed financing
but also creating significant risks.
-
How did this happen?
The dynamic behind this rapid
progress can be understood along three dimensions. (Chapter 2). They are
not mutually exclusive and each provides useful insights for the future
(Table 1):
-
Cambodia has benefited from its recent history and its favorable
geography. The past decade has seen the end of the multi-decade conflict
and the establishment of political stability, the rapid growth of global
trade, and a demographic transition. Geographically, it is a coastal
country in dynamic South East Asia. In this "history and geography"
view, the achievements that underlie Cambodia's sustained
growth are its political and macroeconomic stability, and the policies
that have allowed it to become integrated within the region. These
factors have enabled it to establish a track record of change, including
its accession to the World Trade Organization and the approval of a
number of significant economic laws. On the other hand, this dimension
of the story highlights how vulnerable Cambodia is to the recent global
economic turmoil.
-
Cambodia has helped to fuel growth by drawing on some of its
assets (forestry, fisheries, land, Angkor Wat site), but at the cost of
a reduction in the level or quality of these assets. A related issue is
the low – albeit increasing – level of savings and some misallocation of
savings. Evidence for this view can be found in environmental
concerns (e.g. on the Angkor Wat site), the disproportionately high
returns on some classes of assets (e.g. real estate and land), the
increase in inequality, and the short horizon of many investments. This
dimension suggests a style of growth that is unsustainable and
highlights the importance of sustainable management of assets.
-
Cambodia has achieved rapid growth in an environment of poor
governance through sector-specific or product-specific arrangements.
These are best illustrated by the garments sector. The U.S.-Cambodia
Trade Agreement negotiated in 1999 linked progressive increases in
quotas to improvements in labor standards, monitored by a “third party”
(the International Labour Organization program known as Better Factories
Cambodia, or BFC). This has given Cambodia's overall industry an
international reputation for being able to meet these standards. The
Garment Manufacturers Association of Cambodia (GMAC) has liaised closely
with government counterparts, particularly in the Ministry of Commerce,
to continually address constraints on sustained growth in the sector
(part of this happened because 6NIAC chaired one of the working groups
of the Government-Private Sector Forum). The BFC arrangements and
sectoral collective action and dialogue were crucial in sustaining
growth even after the original quota scheme was phased out. Indeed, the
absence of development in many other sectors can be explained by the
absence of such arrangements. A major question for Cambodia is therefore
how to replicate similar arrangements in other sectors.
Table 1: Understanding A Decade of Rapid Growth
Dimensions |
Evidence |
Lessons Learned |
1.
History and geography |
Benefits from history (post-conflict, global growth, demographic
transition) and geography (East Asia) |
Timing of growth and increase in trade and FDI Demographic trends (dependency ratio) |
Role of political and macro stability Role of openness and international commitments |
2.
Unsustainable use of assets |
Growth fueled by onetime use of natural resources |
High consumption, low savings, rising inequality High returns on some classes of assets Unsustainable management of natural resources |
Need for sustainable management of natural resources Need to further increase domestic and/or foreign savings |
3.
Sector-specific governance |
Growth through narrowly focused solutions to generally bad
governance |
Garment success (extended quotas, monitoring by Better Factories
Cambodia, capacity of business association and close
relationship with government) Limited diversification Role of Government-Private Sector Forum |
Role of third-party monitor (labor standards in garments),
external drivers, and signals Active role of government in creating good sectoral business
environment |
Cf. Chapter 2 |
-
This period of rapid growth profoundly transformed the economy
(Chapter 3). Poverty incidence was reduced from an estimated 45-50
percent in 1993-94 to 30 percent in 2007. Many other social indicators
confirm the improvements in the welfare of the Cambodian people. Key
drivers of these achievements were the labor market changes and the
demographic transition. In the labor market, a major development was the
creation of jobs outside of agriculture, in industry and services: as
these sectors have higher labor productivity than agriculture, this
reallocation of labor had a significant impact on growth. Demographic
trends reveal two baby booms, in the early 1980s and 1990s, followed by
a demographic transition in the 1990s: the reduction of the dependency
ratio over the past decade (fewer non-working age Cambodians for each
working-age Cambodian) contributed 1 to 2 percentage points of per
capita growth per annum.
-
Three conclusions emerge from this review. First, the
current growth dynamic is unlikely to be self-sustaining, because
(i) the economic base is relatively narrow and diversification has made
no progress; (ii) a significant proportion of past growth was driven by
events, such as the demographic transition and the establishment of
political stability, which were either one-offs or in which the major
gains have already been made; (iii) some natural assets, such as
forestry resources, have been used in an unsustainable way; and (iv)
governance arrangements are sector-based. The global financial turmoil
of late 2008, to which Cambodia is not directly exposed given its weak
financial sector, will significantly weaken the existing drivers of growth. Second, some important
conditions for afresh wind have been established: the importance of macroeconomic stability
has been institutionalized; the garment sector has demonstrated that
adequate governance arrangements (and an adequate investment climate)
can deliver growth; the usefulness of an independent third-party monitor
(BFC/ILO) has been proven; the efficiency of partnerships between public
and private sector (the Government-Private Sector Forum) has been
tested; and the role (and limits) of industrial policy have also been
proven. Third, Cambodia's demographics played a major
role in its sustained growth; but a sustained flow of new jobs is
required to absorb the 250,000 or so young Cambodians entering the labor
market each year, many with high expectations prompted by the recent
growth.
Scoping Cambodia's
Growth Potential
-
In this context of highly commendable but fragile
achievements, and sharp global slowdown, from which quarters will
Cambodia new wind blow? Reviewing Cambodia's growth
potential and options for diversification, the analysis highlights four
potential sources of growth (Chapter 4 and 5).
-
First, Cambodia should make the most of its relatively
abundant land, natural assets, and inexpensive labor. A growth
strategy should be built on, rather than run counter to, these
comparative advantages. Unfortunately, at the moment, distortions are
pushing up the price of land, and lack of planning for areas away from
major population centers reduces these areas' potential as a source of
growth. The recent sharp appreciation of the Cambodian riel (due to
inflation in a context of a stable Cambodian riel against the US dollar)
has also increased the cost of labor (a problem compounded by poor
industrial relations, leading to a high incidence of strikes). It is
important to correct these distortions to enable Cambodia to make the
most of its comparative advantages. If this can be achieved, it should
continue to perform well in agriculture, tourism, and light
manufacturing. Cambodia should in parallel upgrade its endowment — in
particular through education, health, and infrastructure — to enable a
transition to a new set of comparative advantages in the medium term.
-
Agriculture will continue to be important, but needs to
be complemented by development in other sectors. Experience in Cambodia and
other countries has shown the central role of agriculture-led growth, in
particular in reducing poverty (since more than 9 out of 10 of the poor live
in rural areas). Cambodia has the potential to significantly increase yields
in rice production and consolidate food security, and this could provide a
sizeable growth dividend in the short term. But experience has also shown
that agriculture is unlikely to grow beyond 5 percent or so per annum, hence
contributing less than 2 percentage points of growth per annum.
Manufacturing will remain very important in absorbing new workers. The fact
that urbanization has proceeded slowly, while value added per worker in
agriculture is similar to other countries at the same level of development,
suggests that Cambodia is not taking full advantage of the agglomeration
effects around urban centers. These should not be ignored, as they will
contribute greatly to growth.
-
Second, Cambodia needs to build on its existing capabilities
and develop new ones as a step towards diversifying its economy. Cambodia
currently has very few of the capabilities needed to move to new products.
Recent cross-country research has shown that certain transitions from
exporting one product to exporting another, are more typical than others,
indicating that the capability- to export product A can often be related to
the capability to export product B. It is no surprise, given the absence of
diversification over the past decade, that there are very few products
“similar in capabilities” to those that Cambodia now exports. This leaves
Cambodia with few options for diversification. One obvious option would be
to develop new products in the garment sector; but other products that
Cambodia is already — although marginally — exporting (such as fish and wood
products) could also be given priority.
-
Third, diversification should also be a matter of new markets,
not only new products. From that point of view, Cambodia has
underperformed in relation to its regional market (only 13 percent of its
trade is intra-regional, against an average of 49 percent). Much more could
be done to integrate further into the East Asia region.
-
Fourth, sustainable management of natural resources,
particularly minerals and energy, represents another growth opportunity.
Although the extent of its reserves remains unclear, Cambodia could
develop a significant extractive industry in oil, gas, and mining over
the next decade. To ensure Cambodia reaps the growth dividends of this
sector, there needs to be a significant upgrade of the sector's
management which, at the moment, is ineffective and opaque. The three
priorities in this area are (i) to clarify the legislative, regulatory, and
institutional framework to increase accountability; (ii) to build the
staffing to implement the framework, recognizing that the capacity- required
develops in tandem with the sector itself over time; and (iii) to manage
expectations in relation to subsidies of petroleum and mining products or
downstream industries.
-
If these changes are achieved, these opportunities should help
Cambodia to sustain growth of around 6 or 7 percent per annum in the
medium term, although the short-term outlook is less encouraging
given the global environment. It is not possible – and
unlikely to be desirable – to pinpoint through such analytical work
which product or which market will emerge: a fresh wind may come, but
policymakers and entrepreneurs will have to "feel it". A sustained
growth rate of 6 to 7 percent per annum would be consistent with: (i)
international experience based on the quality of some drivers of growth
(such as education and financial sector development); and (ii) continued
investments in human and physical capital.
Identifying the
Constraints
-
To realize this potential, it is important to clarify the
constraints on growth (Chapter 6). In a low-income, low-governance
country such as Cambodia, it would be easy to make a case that
everything is a constraint. However, not only would this be at odds with
the experience of rapid growth over the past decade, it would also
contribute little to a growth strategy. The methodology for identifying
and prioritizing constraints consists of enquiring into why
entrepreneurs do not invest more for new capacity or new products, or to
improve productivity. The answer could be either that the returns of the
potential investments are too low or that the cost of financing them
is too high.
-
There is little evidence of finance being a constraint at the
aggregate level. Overall, the financial sector is very liquid (e.g. the
loans-to-deposits ratio is 64 percent), it has developed rapidly in response
to the increasing demand of the past few years, and real interest rates have
recently become negative. Over the longer term, real interest rates and the
rate of investment in durable equipment have been moving in parallel,
suggesting that investment is constrained by demand rather than supply. Two
exceptions stand out. First, large investments are difficult to undertake:
only a link with a foreign investor makes them possible. Second, access to
finance in agriculture remains insufficient and a constraint on farmers'
ability to improve productivity. In addition, there is evidence that a large
part of the available financing comes from foreign savings (cf. for example
the fact that growth and the current account have parallel trends),
highlighting the potential adverse impact of tighter conditions in
international financial markets.
-
Hence the question is why entrepreneurs cannot identify
projects with higher returns. Two hypotheses are possible: either there are
simply too few of these high-return projects (because of excessive costs of
inputs or coordination issues), or entrepreneurs doubt that they can capture
sufficient returns themselves (because of the risks in the environment or
because of official or unofficial taxation). It is likely that the issue is
not primarily the cost of inputs, but one of coordination and appropriation
of returns. Indeed, a striking feature of the Cambodian economy is the
productivity of the top performers (in a few cases on par with more advanced
countries), with a wide dispersion of performance across firms – in most
sectors, firms on average work at 60 percent or less of the productivity of
the top performer.
-
Coordination is a major issue. Production, especially of
new products, requires the coordination of a large number of actors
along the value chain and the establishment of a large number of rules
or regulations for various transactions. This is in particular important
for "self-discovery", i.e. finding out what "Cambodia is good
at". Evidence of the difficulties in achieving this coordination
includes: O the lack of diversification into new products over the past
decade; (ii) the simplicity of the value chains of most products made in
Cambodia (for instance, the vast majority of garment firms are
“cut-make-trim”, the simplest part of the value chain), and (iii) the fact
that most agricultural products are exported as raw commodities (e.g. paddy
rice, unshelled cashew- nuts, unprocessed rubber). This highlights deep
issues in coordinating more complex value chains. In the past, this has
happened in Cambodia mainly through dedicated governance mechanisms (e.g. in
garments).
-
Appropriation issues are pervasive, at the macro and micro
levels. Macroeconomic instability is only a recent concern and
should be promptly addressed (other types of instability costs, such as
crime or security, are now much less of a concern than they were 10
years ago). Entrepreneurs are unable to appropriate the returns of their
investments due to two types of microeconomic issues: (i) disputes
(both commercial and labor) have become a major concern given the lack of an
effective court system; and (ii) corruption remains widespread, in its many
forms. The level of tax itself — as opposed to its administration — is not
viewed as a major constraint. It should be noted that, in relation to both
issues, many firms have found mitigating strategies (such as pre-paying
sales to avoid any dispute; moving toward collective bargaining agreement to
reduce the incidence of labor disputes; keeping businesses informal; etc.),
but many other firms simply have not been set up because of these
appropriation issues, partly explaining the lack of diversification over the
past decade.
-
In relation to input costs, the high costs of electricity and
logistics appear to be major constraints. Their importance is
evident in (i) the willingness of firms to produce 36 percent of their
electricity from expensive generators; (ii) the lack of investment in
electricity-intensive sectors (the garment industry is rather light in
that regard); (iii) the efforts by garment firms to reduce the costs of
transport and customs (over the past four years, the costs of shipping
goods through customs went down for garment firms, but up for rice
producers); and (iv) the high inventories that firms maintain (41 days
on the main input, against less than 30 in most countries). Logistics
services are constrained by poor trade facilitation and complex
cross-border processes. Limited rural road coverage constrains Cambodia's
agriculture potential in particular. The cost of labor remains low, but,
as noted above, the recent sharp appreciation of the Cambodian riel in
real terms is weakening this comparative advantage: unaddressed, it will
weaken the performance of the garment sector and prevent further
diversification.
A New
Wind?
-
The Royal Government of Cambodia has a development strategy,
the National Strategic Development Plan, which elaborates on the goals and
policy priorities laid out in its political platform (the Rectangular
Strategy, the second phase of which was presented by the newly re-elected
Government in September 2008). These strategy documents focus on the key
elements of a growth strategy. The foregoing analysis contributes to further
understanding the drivers of growth in Cambodia, past and future, with a
view to fine-tuning or prioritizing actions to sustain rapid growth.
-
With this background, what actions in today's context could
feasibly contribute to extending the recent period of rapid growth?
This report focuses on three instruments: macroeconomic policy and financial
sector development; fiscal policy; and regulatory, trade, and industrial
policy (Box 1 provides an illustrative list of potential “quick wins”). To
get a fresh wind, three key tactics could be prioritized (Chapter 7-9).
-
The first priority is to deepen Cambodia's integration, in
particular in the East Asia region. The slowdown of global trade
gives this objective an added sense of urgency. Obviously, progress in
trade facilitation (at the border and behind the border) is important.
There are opportunities to make trade within the Greater? Mekong
Subregion much easier, making Cambodia the bridge between Ho Chi Minh
and Bangkok, two of the largest cities in South East Asia. But this
first priority should focus more deeply on inserting Cambodia's firms
into global supply chains: Thai, Chinese, and possibly Vietnamese firms
should increasingly be looking at Cambodia as a place to locate their
factories. Cambodia could use ASEAN as a vehicle for new initiatives in
this area. Three types of action could be considered:
-
Cambodia needs to address financial sector risks (e.g. by
tightening bank entry criteria and by renewing efforts to monitor
non-performing loans) and to manage the policy mix (by containing
inflationary pressures while supporting growth). At the same time, it is
important to manage the exchange rate more actively as Cambodia, being
essentially dollarized, is quickly losing its comparative advantage of
low costs due to inflation and the appreciation of the dollar. It is
important to address this soon, as large revenues from extractive
industries would exacerbate the problem in the future.
-
Trade and investment can be further facilitated, most likely with
a focus on agri-business. This could be accomplished by creating a
dedicated unit to service agri-business investors and by
creating an independent monitor of sanitary and phyto-sanitary standards
(on the model of BFC for labor standards). Doubling rice yields requires
a coordinated approach in order to create the knowledge and incentives
for farmers to apply the appropriate combination of seeds and
fertilizers. Making the existing tax incentives more active could also
generate a significant return.
-
Finally, the diagnostic of constraints on growth stresses the
importance of coordination issues, especially the need to integrate
Cambodia into more complex value chains. As well as the investor
servicing unit and the standards monitor (previous point), consideration
could be given to support for business associations, more proactive
management of Special Economic Zones, and increased access to financial
products (including through a well-functioning credit bureau). An
important platform for identifying and addressing issues of common
concern is the Government-Private Sector Forum (this would require the
Forum to prepare more research and analysis). In addition, a number of
business associations — such as associations for the hotel and garment
industries — could be supported in identifying common issues hurting
productivity and in proposing options for diversifying within the
sectors (in particular, they would have a role in addressing vocational
training issues). Indeed, the government and the private sector need to
work hand in hand to prioritize key constraints and opportunities. The
role of such coordination in agriculture is particularly important and
can take the form of contract farming, farmers' associations
or cooperatives, and self-help groups, etc. Such creative solutions to
providing public goods will be a critical factor for Cambodia's
success in sustaining growth.
-
Second, management of natural resources must be sustainable.
Cambodia can build upon both good experience (e.g. development of
community forestry and fishery) and bad experience (e.g. illegal
logging). The possible development of extractive industries provides
both an opportunity and a series of major challenges. Priorities in this
area include the following:
Box 1:
Quick Wins
- Create
investment servicing office, with professional staff, dedicated
to agri-business and consolidating existing fragmented
responsibilities
- Create
third-party standards monitoring organization, modeled on the
Better Factory Cambodia experience
- Accelerate
trade facilitation reform to offset sharp appreciation of the
Cambodian riel in real terms Deepen role
of Government-Private Sector Forum, by providing it with
research capacity, to develop its role in identifying
constraints on growth
- Implement
property and capital gain taxes and review tax holiday systems
to orient tax incentives more toward productivity and
diversification
|
-
A more decisive effort to manage existing resources should be
initiated, including the demarcation of forests, community forestry and
fisheries, and management of state land. In tourism, coordination should
also be improved.
-
In the area of extractive industries, the legal and fiscal regime
for both petroleum and mining should be clarified urgently. The RGC
should build its capacity to manage the sector, including through
training, computerization, and development of a good cadastre, etc. If
and when the revenue base toms out to be large, external monitoring
mechanisms comparable to BFC would be useful in reinforcing
accountability in the sector (in particular, for revenue collection, the
Extractive Industry Transparence Initiative provides a process and label
to strengthen accountability and to signal Cambodia's commitment to
transparency).
-
More broadly, further experimentation with external mechanisms
addressing governance constraints in a sector-specific way should be
encouraged.
-
Third, in the medium term, Cambodia should upgrade its
endowment to move to the next stages of development. \While it is
not desirable to work against its current comparative advantages,
Cambodia should continue to develop its infrastructure and human
capacity, and mobilize more savings to prepare for future episodes of
growth:
-
Priorities are the upgrading of rural roads, agriculture public
goods (research and extension), and human capital (continuing to stress
primary- education to expand the base). In all cases, however, higher
spending will not be sufficient: the quality of spending (including
addressing institutional issues and electricity pacing, the maintenance
of roads, and the quality of teaching) will matter more than
the level of expenditures. The limited fiscal space also calls for a
strong effort at prioritizing expenditures based on good cost-benefit
analyses (e.g. there is evidence that the returns on improvements in
rural infrastructure in terms of rice yields vary greatly across
regions).
-
Mobilizing domestic savings is likely to become increasingly
important, including to finance infrastructure and education. Expanding
the fiscal space, especially through developing the revenue base, will
be important in this regard.
-
To manage this medium-term agenda, a number of public sector
reforms will take on an increasing importance.
-
Finally, the report identifies three challenging areas for
further analysis (Chapter 10). Although these areas would not
generate an immediate growth dividend, they deserve closer analysis so
that they can be fully integrated into the growth strategy. Urban
development needs to be better managed given the growth potential of
cities and the risk of mismanagement (such as congestion, poor services,
etc, which would reduce incentives to invest and increase costs for
existing firms). Depending on its nature, rapid growth could fuel inequality,
which indeed has increased significantly over the past
four rears: a rapid increase in inequality is not only politically and
socially undesirable, it also tends to be inimical to sustained rapid
growth. Finally, the environment is an asset for Cambodia, but
rapid growth — and global developments such as climate change-are
putting it under stress.
-
Cambodia has made strong progress with a long episode of
rapid growth. The conditions for a new episode of growth, however,
remain highly uncertain. The country has the potential for further
growth and the foregoing analysis has sketched what this potential could
look like. But it will take resolute actions to achieve this potential.
What needs to be done cannot be fully known in advance and the
diagnostic of constraints on growth should be an ongoing process of
testing new policies, scaling up the successful ones, and learning from
failures. This process will require committed leadership and focused
attention on growth constraints and opportunities. If such a process is
achieved, it is indeed possible for Cambodia to push its development
toward new levels, contributing to a number of important welfare and
social outcomes.
|