Aid
Effectiveness Report (AER)
Concept Note (January 2007)
[number in bracket denotes P+H 2006 activity re-located to AER]
Foreword
Overview of 2006
-
Main events (H-A-R, SFDCM, MDSP new direction, CG,
transition to CDCF, GDCC-TWG Review, Declaration, DAC survey)
- Revised 2006 ODA
Database structure (Paris Declaration etc)
- Analysis of OECD/DAC
survey consolidated remarks on process and way forward
- N.B. JMIs to be
discussed in separate document
Analysis |
Commentary |
Sector and
TWG flow |
2006
allocations, trends |
Overall
flow and trend |
NSDP
(Table 5.2) alignment, ODA/GDP and per capita ratios, regional
comparisons? |
DP flow |
Trends
aggregate, by donor. Any noticeable trends? |
Who, what,
where |
DP
disbursements by sector a DP division of labour? |
DP
fragmentation |
Proliferation Index? a
donor division of labour? |
DP
partnerships are new trends emerging, more cooperation? |
Matrix
(financiers on the top, implementers down the side) showing
pass-through of funds from funding DPs to implementing partners. By $
(and by project?) Graph of partnerships by sector. |
Geographical flow (by sector) |
Are needs
different by province? (Map to MoP analysis/poverty profile) |
Implementation arrangements |
NGO
partnerships which donors use which NGOs, in which sectors? How does
the data compare with or complement the NGO Database? |
Modalities
(10) |
Trends in
programme-based approaches etc |
New loan
financing |
Basic debt
sustainability ratios (Service/XGS, Stock/XGS trends?). Terms of new
financing? |
TA |
Where? How
much? New aid modalities (PBAs) and new approach to meeting TA needs |
PIUs (7/8) |
How many,
where are they, integrated/parallel etc? Monitor new ones as per the
October 2006 Declaration |
Paris
Indicators (3/9) |
Aggregate
results. By sector. By DP. (Includes tied aid) |
Missions &
analytical work (11) |
By sector,
by month |
Predictability (5) |
Use 2005
DCR projections (CG pledging?) against 2006 actual. Analysis by DP &
sector absorption? Possible areas to focus on improvements? |
Profiles
(Donor and sector) |
Donor and
sector profiles (biggest 10 projects, type of support, PD indicator
summary; largest 5 donors, largest projects by sector etc) |
Database and Structural Issues (technical note possibly an annex)
H-A-R Implementation Report (see Annex 1)
Issues in Aid Management (additional to H-A-R)
NSDP Financing (Forward looking data analysis)
Conclusions - Aid management policy options
-
Modifications to H-A-R?
- Portfolio reviews to
focus on "aid effectiveness audits"? And to enhance ownership and
capacity.
- Joint Assistance
Strategies any value?
- Mutual
accountability frameworks useful tools?
Annex 1
H-A-R
Monitoring
Based on
the January 2007 reports of the TWGs to the GDCC (and others from 2006),
and paying particular attention to those TWGs that are identified in the
H-A-R as having identified responsibility for activities. To include
assessment/reflection on:
Ownership
-
Sector ministries
and agencies develop NSDP-based sector plans, prioritized results-based
programs, and a sector MTEF.
-
The PIP is
updated annually to feed into the national budget preparation process.
-
Implement the
Strategic Framework for Development Cooperation Management to strengthen
the capacity of CDC/CRDB and sector ministries and agencies.
-
CDC/CRDB provides
technical support to RGC on aid coordination and aid management issues
based on support requested by the Chair of the TWGs.
Alignment
-
Development
partners review their strategies to align with NSDP priorities and
sector plans.
-
Development
partners align with sector plans included in the PIP.
-
MEF continues to
implement the PFM reform program.
-
Development
partners and MEF establish mutually agreed framework to assess PFM and
procurement systems.
-
Each development
partner provides to CDC/CRDB reliable indicative commitments of aid over
a multi-year framework and disburses in a timely fashion.
-
CDC/CRDB carries
out a survey on PIU/PMUs, and develops a strategy to integrate in the
government' structure. Implement the agreed strategy secure an agreement
that no new parallels to be established
-
All sector plans
& projects include an assessment of the capacity gaps.
-
Each sector TWG
prepares and implements a capacity development program.
-
Development
partners provide financial support for the application of MBPI/PMG
schemes.
-
CDC/CRDB carries
out a survey to collect information on the proportion of aid delivered
through untied-aid modality, formulate and implement a strategy to
increase the proportion of untied ODA.
Harmonisation
-
CDC/CRDB and
development partners jointly set targets on the portion of ODA that is
to be delivered through Program Based Approaches (PBAs) to be reached by
2010 in the framework of NSDP.
-
Each TWG prepares
a plan to increase delegated cooperation within their sector/thematic
area.
-
Each TWG prepares
a calendar of field missions, diagnostic reviews and studies.
-
Development
partners provide an annual report to CDC/CRDB on progress made to
implement their country action plans that have been prepared as part of
the follow up to the Paris Declaration.
-
Concerned
ministries and donors develop, in consultation with stakeholders, a
common procedure to strengthen EIAs at sector and national level and
strengthen technical and policy capacity to carry out environmental
analysis and to enforce legislation.
-
Concerned
ministries and donors develop common guidelines to tackle cross-cutting
issues e.g. gender, HIV/AIDS.
Managing for Results
-
MOP develops and
implements a framework to monitor the implementation of the NSDP and
prepares an annual progress review of NSDP implementation.
-
Development
partners ensure that the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and
National Operational Guidelines (NOG) are followed in monitoring and
reporting.
Mutual
Accountability
-
CDC/CRDB and
development partners jointly assess and report on progress in
implementing HAR.
-
A review of the
TWG mechanism.
-
Development
partners provide transparent and comprehensive information to CDC/CRDB
on ODA flows (including contributions to NGOs) to enable integration
into budget cycle.
|