1. The purpose of this report is to present a succinct update on progress that has been made by the Royal Government of Cambodia and the development partners to implement RGC's Action Plan on Harmonization and Alignment. The Action Plan that was prepared by RGC through an extensive consultation process with the development partners outlines specific actions that will be taken to implement the commitments made in the Rome Declaration. The Action Plan was approved by the Council of Ministers on 19 November 2004. Also, the Royal Government and 12 development partners who have shown a willingness to support the implementation of the Action Plan on Harmonization and Alignment signed a Declaration on 2 December 2004. 2. The purpose of this report is to present an update on progress that has been made by the Royal Government of Cambodia and the development to implement the H&A Action Plan over the last six months -- December 2004- May 2005. Summary of Progress 3. Overall, almost all of the planned activities that were to be completed during the last six months have been completed. Cambodia's report on progress toward enhanced aid effectiveness was presented by H.E. Keat Chhon at the Second High Level Forum (28 Feb - 2 March 2005). The work on the preparation of NSDP is somewhat behind schedule because of delays in the recruitment of an Advisor and putting in place technical and coordination structures needed for the preparation of the NSDP. 4. Details of progress made on each specific activity are summarized in the attached Annex I.
Partnership and
Harmonization TWG
|
|||||||||||
|
Section A: Ownership and Leadership | ||||
Results | Actions Needed | Milestones | Timing | Progress |
1. RGC leads the process and prepares a single Strategic National Development Framework for the next planning cycle (2006-2010) | ||||
a) RGC prepares and adopts a single National Strategic Development Plan (2006-2010). |
|
|
|
|
|
TWG on Planning & Poverty Reduction established and starts developing NSDP. |
December 2004 |
TWG on Planning and Poverty Reduction has been established. A meeting of the TWG was held on 3 June 2005. |
|
|
Technical meetings in MOP held to discuss NSDP preparation process and guidelines for the preparation of NSDP issued.
|
January 2005
|
Guidelines for NSDP formulation were distributed to ministries in December
2004, through a "Circular on the Formulation of the National Strategic
Development Plan: 2006-2010". It included information on the conceptual
framework, institutional framework for the formulation process, and
working schedule. Several technical meetings have been held, that have
included an Inter-ministerial meeting on 20 April 2005 and a TWG-PPR
meeting on 3 June 2005. In its progress report to the GDCC meeting held on
14 June 2005, the TWG has reported delays in a number of areas, including
delays in the recruitment of the Advisor. |
|
|
Sector Strategic Plans prepared.
|
May 2005
|
The Sector Strategic Plans including the results matrix with sector development priorities are currently being prepared. |
|
|
Technical workshop(s)
|
June-August 2005
|
||
|
Preparation of national sector programs in at least 2 sectors |
|
A seminar was organized by the P&H TWG with assistance from SIDA for senior officials of ministries and donor representatives on concepts, features, and conditions of SWAp/PBAs on 9-10 June 2005 at CDC. The purpose was to enhance the understanding of government officials and donor personnel on SWAp and program-based approaches. |
|
(iii) Expand the application of SWAps, SWiMs, and PBAs modalities in appropriate sectors, e.g.
|
|
|
||
b) RGC uses a single national development framework for planning linked to resource allocation, including ODA. |
(i) Use the new TWG on Planning and Poverty Reduction as mechanism for coordination for planning and monitoring the implementation of the NSDP. |
Process for coordination for planning and monitoring of NSDP established. |
|
The TWG on Planning and Poverty Reduction has been established and making progress. However, TWG needs to further strengthen coordination with other TWGs. |
(ii) Build a common understanding of relationship between the NSDP and other planning and budgeting mechanism. |
Workshops to disseminate information on NSDP and other planning & budget mechanisms. |
Throughout 2005 |
Not yet organized. |
|
|
MEF & MOP explore options and take appropriate actions. |
Beginning 2006 |
||
|
Sector priorities incorporated in the MTEF. |
2006 |
||
2. RGC assumes leadership role in the coordination of development assistance | ||||
a) Cambodia’s Action Plan for Harmonization and Alignment—2004-2008, outlining RGC’s priorities on harmonization and alignment, is prepared and agreed with development partners. |
|
Government approves National Action Plan. |
November 2004 |
The RGC H&A Action Plan 2004-2008 was prepared and was approved by the Council of Ministers on 19 November 2004. |
(ii) Secure agreement between RGC and interested donors on a Partnership Agreement. |
|
|
RGC and 12 development partners who have shown willingness to support the implementation of the Action Plan on harmonization and Alignment signed a Declaration on 2 December 2004. These include: ADB, Australia, Canada, DANIDA, DFID, EC, France, Germany, Japan, SIDA, UN System and World Bank. |
|
b) RGC has one ODA coordinating body. |
(i) Strengthen CDC's leading role within the RGC on ODA coordination and resource mobilization. |
|
|
CRDB/CDC is the focal point within the Royal Government for resource mobilization and aid coordination. |
(ii) Strengthen CDC's focal point for ODA planning. |
CDC leads all discussions for ODA planning. |
|
CRDB/CDC has been leading discussions on ODA planning. |
|
|
Endorsement of CDC lead role to implement H & A Action Plan. |
|
CRDB/CDC has been leading the process for the preparation and monitoring the implementation of RGC's Action Plan on H&A. |
|
c) RGC’s ODA Management Policy prepared and agreed with donors. |
|
|
|
|
d) Joint planning and monitoring of the implementation of RGC’s development priorities, involving donors and stakeholders, as outlined in its strategic development framework(s) and its Rectangular Strategy. |
|
Inform CG |
December 2004 |
|
e) RGC has the information it needs to lead and coordinate development assistance. |
|
|
June 2005 |
There has been little progress in this area. |
|
Periodic reports, on quarterly basis, provided. |
Start Jan 2005 |
So far, no organized effort has been made in this area. |
|
3. As one of the fourteen pilot countries, Cambodia plays an active role in the implementation of the Rome Declaration on Harmonization and Alignment (2003). | ||||
|
(i) RGC reports progress at the Second High Level Forum on Harmonization and Alignment (HLF2). |
Progress report presented at HLF 2. |
|
The RGC progress report was presented at the HLF2 by H.E. Sr. Minister Keat Chhon and disseminated to all development partners. |
|
Reports prepared and presented to GDCC. |
on-going |
This report is the first six monthly progress report on the implementation of the RGC Action Plan on H&A. |
|
(iii) RGC participates in Regional Workshop on Harmonization and Alignment. |
.... |
On-going |
The RGC plans to participate in Regional Workshop, when it is organized. |
|
Section B: Capacity Development | ||||
1. RGC’s capacity strengthened to effectively perform development coordination and management functions | ||||
|
(i) Assessment of the capacity development needs of the relevant government agencies to effectively perform development coordination and management functions completed within the context of the preparation of sector plans (SWAps). |
Each sector plan (SWAP) includes capacity development needs assessment and strategy for filling the critical gaps. |
December 2005 |
|
(ii) Secure commitments from ministries and development partners to support the identified capacity development needs secured. |
Adequate commitment (financial) secured. |
December 2005 |
||
|
|
|
No progress to report. |
|
|
Each sector plan (SWAP) includes capacity development needs assessment and strategy for filling the critical gaps. |
December 2005 |
||
(vi) TWGs provide timely feedback on all sector capacity development proposals to ensure that the TA to be provided is based on demand-driven needs at the sector/program level |
Process designed and disseminated |
June 2005 |
The TWGs are expected to review all development cooperation activities in their area to ensure that capacity development issues are dealt with adequately and that TA to be provided is based on demand-driven needs at the sector/program level. |
|
b) Agreement on principle and practices of donor support for allowances and salary supplements to Government employees. |
(i) Finalize strategies to deal with incentives issues, including salary supplements, finalized. |
|
CAR has reported that a "2 track" proposal has been tabled for discussion. Further consultations are planned to be carried out with TWGs. An MOU has been signed between CAR and MEF to implement a PMG/MBPI scheme for the PFM reform program. |
|
|
TWGs develop Action Plans in their areas. |
December 2005 |
||
(iii) Develop guidelines for remuneration of local consultants and Cambodian nationals employed on donor supported programs/projects, based on market principles. |
|
|
||
Section C: Alignment | ||||
1. RGC and donors adopt the consolidated Strategic Development Plan of the RGC as the common framework for planning ODA. | ||||
Donor activities are aligned with government strategies and policies. |
|
All new donor country strategy documents are aligned to the RGC Strategic Development Plans and to the NSDP (2006-2010). |
|
The NSDP currently under preparation will be the framework to which all donor country strategies shall be aligned. |
2. Donor practices are harmonized around the generic elements of the program/project cycle |
||||
a) Government introduces national operational guidelines for development cooperation activities covering all component of the program/project cycle. |
(i) RGC prepares in collaboration with development partners national operational guidelines for development cooperation activities on the grant side that embody international standards, and adopts these guidelines. |
National Operational Guidelines prepared, agreed and discussed with partners, and adopted by government and partners. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
b) Development assistance is increasingly delivered in accordance with RGC's priorities. |
|
|
|
|
3 Donors increasingly use Government's systems, procedures and practices, where appropriate |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Donors increase the share of aid commitments provided through multi-year funding arrangements |
Where sector-wide MTEF exist, increasing number of donors commit to multi-year financing |
|
|
|
|
|
||
iii) Identify new areas where the direct budget support modality may be a viable option for disbursing ODA funds. |
New areas identified. |
|
|
|
|
(i) Review and Upgrade Government procurement and financial Management. |
Government procurement and financial system improved. |
|
A comprehensive PFM reform program is being implemented that has made substantive progress over the last six months. |
(ii) Standardize reporting formats for sector programs. |
Reporting format agreed and implemented – utilized for sector programs. |
|
|
|
|
As NAA capacity builds, then an increased proportion of ODA is audited by NAA |
|
This action has been recognized by the TWG on PFM and activities are being developed to strengthen capacity in NAA. |
|
(iv) All donors give CDC permission to freely disseminate information on ODA. |
Agreement with all donors secured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Section D: Harmonization and Streamlining | ||||
1. Donor-Donor harmonization is strengthened to reduce transaction costs and to maximize ODA benefits for Cambodia | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SWAPs in other areas formulated. |
December 2006 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Donor country Offices take actions to tackle HQ constraints where these occur. |
Information on donor country office constraints to harmonize shared at GDCC meetings. | on-going | So far no information has been provided by donors to CRDB/CDC or the GDCC. | |
|
|
|
|
|
Donors integrate PIUs/PMUs into RGC's institutional structures. |
PIUs/PMUs integrated into Government structures by 2007 |
2005 |
No progress to report. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|